LA RAZA KNOWS FULLY THAT OBAMA’S LA RAZA INFESTED ADMIN AND
LA RAZA JANET ARE KEEPING THE BORDERS WIDE OPEN FOR HORDES MORE TO JUMP FOR
AMNESTY.
“But in the last year or so, there have
been signs of an increase, and now a new poll suggests many Mexicans would come
to the U.S. if they had the chance. And many of them would come illegally if
necessary.”
*
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS LONG PROPAGANDIZED THAT THERE WERE
ONLY 11 MILLION ILLEGALS IN THIS COUNTRY. THERE THAT MANY IN CA ALONE. MOST
FIGURES PUT THE FIGURE AT 40 MILLION…now go do the math!
The Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes
Project released a survey Monday to help set the stage for President Obama's
visit to Mexico later this week. In 1,000 in-person interviews conducted across
Mexico last month, Pew researchers asked, in Spanish, "If at this moment,
you had the means and opportunity to go to live in the United States, would you
go?" Thirty-five percent of those surveyed said yes.
The population of Mexico is about 110
million. If the Pew numbers are correct, that means about 38 million would like
to live in the U.S.
Byron York: Could there be another wave of illegal
immigration?
Chief Political Correspondent
One
argument often heard in the debate over comprehensive immigration reform is
that the flow of illegal immigrants from Mexico to the United States, once
measured in the hundreds of thousands per year, has slowed dramatically and is
not likely to pick up again.
"All
across Mexico's ruddy central plains, most of the people who could go north
already have," reported the New York Times in early April. "[P]ast
experience and current trends in both Mexico and the United States suggest that
legalization would not lead to a sudden flood of illegal immigration on the
scale of what occurred after 1986."
THE
NEW YORK TIMES IS
MEXICAN OWNED AND IS NOW THE MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY!
Some
reformers have cited stories like the Times' to suggest there's no need for
sweeping new border security or workplace enforcement measures; illegal
immigration is on the decline anyway.
It is
true that net migration from Mexico fell to virtually nothing during the depths
of the Great Recession. That did not mean Mexicans stopped coming to the U.S.,
but rather that the number of Mexicans entering the U.S. and the number leaving
were about the same. But in the last year or so, there have been
signs of an increase, and now a new poll suggests many Mexicans would come to
the U.S. if they had the chance. And many of them would come illegally if
necessary.
The Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes
Project released a survey Monday to help set the stage for President Obama's
visit to Mexico later this week. In 1,000 in-person interviews conducted across
Mexico last month, Pew researchers asked, in Spanish, "If at this moment,
you had the means and opportunity to go to live in the United States, would you
go?" Thirty-five percent of those surveyed said yes.
The population of Mexico is about 110
million. If the Pew numbers are correct, that means about 38 million would like
to live in the U.S.
Going
into a little more detail, Pew found 20 percent of all Mexicans would be
"inclined to go work and live in the U.S. without authorization."
That's about 22 million people who might come to the U.S. illegally, if they
had the chance.
"The story line that we've been
hearing that Mexican immigration to the U.S. is now over is simply not
true," says Mark Krikorian, head of the Center for Immigration Studies,
which favors stricter immigration enforcement. "It could well be that we
won't see the same level of Mexican illegal immigration that we saw in the '90s
and '00s, but if 38 million people want to come here, that's a lot of people."
The
Pew study offers mixed evidence on the magnetic pull of the United States
economy for poor Mexicans. On the one hand, Pew asked Mexicans whether people
who left their country for the U.S. "have a better life [in the U.S.], a
worse life there, or is life neither better nor worse there?" Forty-seven
percent of respondents said immigrants to the U.S. had a better life, versus 18
percent who said they had a worse life and 29 percent who said neither. That 47
percent figure is a bit lower than in recent years.
On the
other hand, when Pew asked Mexicans whether their friends or relatives who
moved to the U.S. had achieved their goals or been disappointed, 70 percent
said they had achieved their goals, versus 25 percent who said they had been
disappointed.
Finally,
Pew found Mexican goodwill toward the United States has risen significantly in
the last few years. Favorable attitudes toward the U.S. plunged after the
passage of the Arizona immigration law in 2010. At that point, 48 percent of
Mexicans said they viewed the U.S. unfavorably, versus 44 percent who viewed
the U.S. favorably. Now, the numbers are 66 percent favorable, 30 percent
unfavorable.
Put
the Pew figures together, and they suggest that large-scale new immigration
from Mexico, illegal as well as legal, is entirely possible. Not only are many
Mexicans inclined to come to the U.S., but many of the reasons holding them
back -- dreadful American economic conditions being the biggest -- could change
in the future. Conditions in Mexico could change, too, in a direction that
spurs more people to leave.
And that could mean a new wave of illegal
immigration. "What it all adds up to is that there are always going to be
significant numbers of Mexicans who are going to want to come here, regardless
of our laws," says Krikorian. "So border security, and more broadly
immigration security, is not something we can dispense with."
Byron
York, The Washington Examiner's chief political
correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com.
His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blog posts appear
on washingtonexaminer.com.
HERITAGE FOUNDATION: OBAMA’S AMNESTY
WOULD ADD 100 MORE ILLEGALS AND COST AMERICANS (Legals) BILLIONS AND BILLIONS
Obama’s Promise of Homeland Security
to Americans (Legals) and his Vow to Illegals of Open and Undefended Borders
With Narcomex
The OBAMA – McCAIN Amnesty Promises NO E-VERIFY enforcement
to Employers and NO BORDER enforcement to LA RAZA invaders.
…isn’t
that what we already have going ????
Dream Act proposals are also a magnet for fraud. Many illegal
immigrants will fraudulently claim they came here as children or that they are
under 30. And the federal government has no way to check whether their claims
are true or not. REP. LAMAR SMITH
"It lets businesses that knowingly
violated the law off the hook," Mr. Krikorian said. "If they were not
withholding payroll taxes, they’re held harmless. If they were violating labor
laws, they’re held harmless. So this is a boon for crooked business."…
MARK KRIKORIAN
“Another force for amnesty is corporate America. Thousands of
businesses have hired illegals in violation of U.S. law. Amnesty for their illegal
workers means, de facto, amnesty for them”… PAT BUCHANAN
ARIZONA
Whose
Country Is This?
Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
With
the support of 70 percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and
police to secure the border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom
now reside there.
Arizona
acted because the U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to
protect the states from invasion and refuses to enforce America's immigration
laws.
"We
in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act,"
said Gov. Jan Brewer. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have
created an unacceptable situation."
We
have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington.
What is the response of Barack
Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?
He is siding with the
law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a
Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is
commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to
fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
He
has denounced Arizona as "misguided." He has called on the Justice
Department to ensure that Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's
civil rights. But he has said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona
who must deal with the costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in
their midst.
OBMAMA’S LA RAZA WELFARE STATE… plus illegals get all the jobs!
“Since
President Obama came into office, SNAP participation has increased at 10 times
the rate of job creation, the annual spending on SNAP has doubled, and one in
seven Americans now participates in SNAP,”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/04/obama-rushes-to-expand-la-raza-welfare_26.html
TOP – STEALTH AMNESTY... Obama and McCain greet new invaders at the open borders!
Is the CIA Investigation the OBAMA – McCAIN Amnesty as
a Surrender of American Sovereignty to Mexico?
THE
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR: The US should think long and hard
about the high number of Latino immigrants.
THESE
FIGURES ARE VERY DATED. THEY ARE ALSO PREDICATED ON A POPULATION OF ILLEGALS AT
ABOUT 11 MILLION, WHICH IS ENTIRELY LA RAZA DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA. THE REAL
NUMBERS, EVEN FROM DHS IS ABOUT 40 MILLION AND BREEDING (AT OUR EXPENSE) LIKE
BUNNIES. NOW DO THE FIGURES FOR HOW MANY “CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS WILL BE IN OUR
JOBS, PUSHING OUR ANCHOR BABIES FOR 18 YEARS OF WELFARE, LOOTING WELFARE AND
OBAMACARE….?
(from
the article)
The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are
affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work.
Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190
billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the
labor market at the low-wage end.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/02/anchor-baby-breeding-mexicos-staggering.html
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
from the May 28,
2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html
What will
America stand for in 2050?
The US should
think long and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.
from the May 28,
2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html
…and still they
sabotage E-VERIFY to ease more illegals into our jobs!
FEDS PREDICT
SOARING UNEMPLOYMENT UNTIL PAST 2015… Good time for amnesty?
Obama and Justice Sotomayor (A LA
RAZA PARTY MEMBER) Vow to Illegals to SABOTAGE E-verify!
VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY?
REP. LAMAR SMITH HAS CONSISTENTLY AND OPENLY VOICED OPPOSITION TO OBAMA’S
ASSAULT ON OUR BORDERS AND JOBS… even as most politicians HISPANDER for the
illegals’ ILLEGAL VOTES.
Obama soft on illegals enforcement
Arrests of
illegal immigrant workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama,
according to figures released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative
arrests, indictments and convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all
fell by more than 50 percent
from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift
enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at
the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican
who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican
on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the
wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs
that Americans otherwise would hold.
MORE OBAMA
DREAM ACTS of WELFARE for ILLEGALS?
REP. LAMAR
SMITH for PRESIDENT
"We could cut
unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal
workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the
Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the
American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help
citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than
fail to enforce immigration laws."
REP. LAMAR SMITH
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are practicing
"La Reconquista" in California."
A Question of Citizenship… IN MEXIFORNIA,
ILLEGALS HAVE MORE RIGHTS THAN LEGALS!
A
Commentary By Debra J. Saunders
Tuesday,
August 10, 2010
Trust
Republicans to go too far. They take a good idea -- such as the notion that the
federal government should enforce immigration laws, and states should be able
to help -- and then drive it into the fringes. Witness a Fox News interview in
which Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., declared, "We should change our
Constitution and say if you come here illegally, and you have a child, that
child is automatically not a citizen."
Graham
has supported a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He opposed the new
Arizona immigration law. So why would he advocate repealing part of the 14th
Amendment -- which, by the way, exists because the Grand Old Party wanted to
stop efforts to keep freed slaves from becoming citizens?
Graham's
right about this much: Illegal immigrants have taken advantage of the law. The
Dallas Morning News reported Sunday that 60,000 babies are born annually in
Texas to illegal immigrants. Last year, these "anchor babies"
accounted for 16 percent of the state's births.
But
it's not clear how many illegal immigrants are coming here to have babies as
opposed to having babies in America because they are here.
Then
there's the recent Washington Post story about "birth tourism" and
affluent expectant mothers paying offshore consultants a $14,750 fee to obtain
tourism visas that allow them to give birth in the United States and win U.S.
citizenship for their babies.
No
one likes to see adults game the system. In June, pollster Scott Rasmussen
found that 58 percent of voters say a child born to an illegal immigrant should
not automatically become a citizen of the United States.
But
there are better ways to deal with those abuses. Direct the State Department to
deny visas to would-be birth tourists. Keep the heat on employers who knowingly
hire illegal workers. The new Arizona immigration law is designed to achieve
"attrition through enforcement." Deport more adults who, unlike
children, knowingly break the law.
But
some Republicans want to keep going. Rep.
Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is arguing that the 14th Amendment does not and never did
confer automatic birthright citizenship.
Section One states, "All persons born or
naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are
citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
"There are two elements, birth and
subject to the jurisdiction," Chapman University Law School Dean John C.
Eastman told me. "For about 50 years, we've just assumed birth was all you
needed." But a review of the original debates and early court cases
demonstrates a recognition that parents had to "show allegiance." If
they broke federal law, they "never qualified" as being under U.S.
jurisdiction.
This
is where the argument gets dicey. Eastman has argued that a child born to a
Saudi in the United States on a temporary student visa was not under U.S.
jurisdiction, as the father had not declared allegiance to America. Eastman's
answer is to let people come here to study or work, but as something less than
guests.
This
path could turn a melting pot nation into an empire of the native born and
law-abiding foreign workers who never have a chance to belong. Think Old
Europe. Think Saudi Arabia.
But don't think
MORE welfare
and JOBS for ILLEGALS and no real border security…
AMNESTY from OBAMA and MEXICO’S GANG
of LA RAZA 8
THE
LIES, the SPIN and then MORE LIES and then MORE WELFARE:
Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio told
Fox News that newly-legalized immigrants will be given a provisional status and
“will have to stay in that status until at least ten years elapse and [border
security] triggers are met," but loopholes could create a fast track for
some illegal immigrants.