ROMNEY ON THE MEX
INVASION, OCCUPATION AND WELFARE STATE:
Mitt Romney, on
immigration reform, opposes the Dream Act, opposes Pathways to Citizenship. In
fact, he’s calling for self-deportation. He opposes guest worker programs,
opposes tuition breaks for undocumented kids who are in the United States. Why
would Hispanics vote for that candidate?
*
OBAMA ON THE MEX
INVASION, OCCUPATION AND WELFARE STATE:
OBAMA HAS PROMISED
ILLEGALS NO E-VERIFY TO EASE EVEN MORE INTO OUR JOBS AND KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED
FOR HIS PAYMASTERS, DREAM ACTS, OPEN BORDERS, AMNESTY or at least CONTINUED
NON-ENFORCEMENT!
*
JOHN “McAMNESTY”
McCain’s state of ARIZONA is the MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS’ GATEWAY to the American
southwest.
“Because I
sympathized with her, and the citizens of my state that were incredibly
frustrated. We had a border patrol agent killed. We had a rancher who was
killed by drug smugglers. People were not safe in their homes, in the southern
part of our state.” McCain
PHOENIX IS THE SECOND
LARGEST CENTER FOR MEXICAN KIDNAPPING NEXT TO MEXICO CITY.
IT IS AMERICA’S
BIGGEST CENTER FOR MEXICAN HOME INVASION.
“There are a hundred
guides sitting on mountaintops right now in Arizona, guiding the drug cartels
as they bring the drugs across the Arizona/Mexico border, up to Phoenix, where
they are distributed throughout the nation.”
THE STATES PUTS OUT
BILLIONS IN WELFARE AND COST RELATED TO MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE. NOT ONE
CITIZEN (legal) IN AZ VOTED TO BE MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE.
THE PEOPLE OF AZ HAVE
SEEN WHAT THE LA RAZA DEMS IN MEXIFORNIA HAVE DONE TO CA. FEINSTEIN, BOXER,
PELOSI, LOFGREN, WAXMAN, ALONG WITH MEX FASCIST REPS. BECERRA, SANCHEZ SISTERS
LINDA and LORETTA, JOE BACA AND GRACE NAPOLITANO HAVE BUILT A MEX FASCIST STATE
IN CA WHERE ILLEGALS COLLECT BILLIONS IN WELFARE AND GET THE JOBS!
HERE’S AN EXAMPLE OF A
TRAITOR: JOHN McCAIN- MEXICO’S LA RAZA REPUBLICAN IN THE SENATE, AND HIS
SIDEKICK, JUAN WILLIAMS, A CITIZEN OF MEXICO AND AGENT FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY:
(JUAN WILLIAMS WAS McCAIN’S PAID
LIAISON TO THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST FASCIST MOVEMENT WHEN HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT)
John McCain: Issue of Immigration Stands between Latinos and
GOP, Fox News Latino, May 17, 2012
JUAN WILLIAMS: Senator John McCain thanks for coming in for
this Fox News Latino exclusive.
SEN. JOHN McCAIN (R-AZ):Thank you.
WILLIAMS: Senator, why do you keep saying that the Hispanic
vote is up for grabs, when polls consistently show that President Obama has
close to seventy percent support in the Latino community? (OBAMA HAS PROMISED ILLEGALS NO E-VERIFY TO EASE EVEN
MORE INTO OUR JOBS AND KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED FOR HIS PAYMASTERS, DREAM ACTS,
OPEN BORDERS, AMNESTY or at least CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT!)
McCAIN: And he had very strong, strong support in 2008 as
well. Because I think that there are many values, and things that we share, we
Republicans: lower taxes, pro military, small business, you know how Hispanic
or Latinos are small business people, Pro-life. There are many areas there that
they would, in my view, would be naturally attracted to the Republican banner.
And they in fact… George Bush, Bush II did well in his elections, with Hispanic
voters. And, we all know what the answer is, and what the problem is. It’s the
issue of immigration. And we have to treat it in a humane fashion, and we have
to understand that with any new wave of immigrants that comes to our country,
whether it be Irish, or Italian, Poles, whoever it is, Hispanics in America, or
Latinos, have an allegiance to the people who are coming and that are still in
the country they came from.
WILLIAMS: Well, let’s look at the likely GOP nominee stance.
Mitt Romney, on immigration reform,
opposes the Dream Act, opposes Pathways to Citizenship. In fact, he’s calling
for self-deportation. He opposes guest worker programs, opposes tuition breaks
for undocumented kids who are in the United States. Why would Hispanics vote
for that candidate?
McCAIN: Well, first of all, as you described Mitt Romney is
not the case in all due respect. He is solidly in favor of immigration reform.
He knows that there are twelve million people (TRY
40 MILLION OLD MAN!) who are in this country illegally. He knows you
have to address it. He has also stated, recently, and I’m happy to say, that we
have to address it in a humane fashion. The issue of self-deportation, there
are some Hispanics who have come back, but he doesn’t—gone back to the country
that they, mainly ‘cause the economic conditions here. So he, he doesn’t—but he
doesn’t think that’s the, the entire answer to the issue. As you know Marco
Rubio and some others are working on a version of the Dream Act. And by the way
also he does not oppose guest worker programs either, either for high tech, or
for agricultural workers.
Look, Mitt Romney understands that we have a challenge with
the Hispanic voter. I believe, as this campaign moves on, that you will see him
addressing this issue of the need for immigration reform. We all know what we
need to happen. Let me just, I have one more small point, I’m sorry for the
long answer, but you are touching on one of the key issues of the 2012
Presidential campaign. We still do have a huge problem with drugs coming across
our border. There are a hundred guides
sitting on mountaintops right now in Arizona, guiding the drug cartels as they
bring the drugs across the Arizona/Mexico border, up to Phoenix, where they are
distributed throughout the nation. And the price of cocaine, by the way, on
the street, has not gone up one penny, despite all of our drug efforts. That’s
the best indicator as to how we’re doing on the, quote, war on drugs. So
there’s a bigger problem than just illegal immigrants coming across our border.
There are still drugs, and we’re creating a demand, and that’s, you know, a big
part of the issue. And that, that can’t go on, Juan. It can’t.
WILLIAMS: Let me go back then.
McCAIN: Yeah.
WILLIAMS: With all due respect.
McCAIN: Sure.
WILLIAMS: You say he, he doesn’t oppose a guest worker
program. He has refused to get involved in putting forward any guest worker
program, and like you, Senator McCain…
McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
WILLIAMS: …He says, oh no, first we have to secure the
border.
McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
WILLIAMS: Well, there are now more boots on the ground than
ever, and…
McCAIN: We have made progress.
(MEXICO HAS MORE BILLIONAIRES
THAN SAUDI ARABIA. THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD IS NO LONGER BILL GATES, IT IS
MEXICAN CARLOS SLIM. YOU WON’T HEAR ABOUT THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST MOVEMENT
TALKING ABOUT MEXICO DOING SOMETHING FOR THEIR PEOPLE OTHER THAN EXPORTING THEM
TO LOOT AMERICA!)
WILLIAMS: …DHS says they have put more money, in terms of
technology and surveillance on the border. And yet, the entire immigration
debate, during the Republican primaries, was cast in terms of drug dealers,
human trafficking, not in terms of
people simply seeking economic opportunity and a better life for their
families.
McCAIN: Juan, most of the people now who come across, or
large numbers of people who come across, are brought by coyotes. The young
women are raped (BY THEIR FELLOW MEX COUNTRYMAN!),
they’re put in drop houses in Phoenix, Arizona, where they are kept in the most
unspeakable condition, and held for ransom. The human rights abuses, not to
mention the tearing up of our wildlife refuges, which is taking place as well,
by these drug dealers and others who are coming across. We have made progress (LEGALS ARE NOT ONLY FIGHTING THE MEX DRUG CARTELS BUT
ALSO OBAMA’S SABOTAGE OF OUR BORDERS!), but we have by no means gotten
our border secure. So obviously Americans want both. They want both a secure
border, that’s an obligation of every country, but I think they also understand
that we have a serious issue out there that needs to be addressed. And I think…
WILLIAMS: But Senator, I think you know…
McCAIN: Yeah, go ahead.
WILLIAMS: …That in fact, most of the undocumented people in
the United States don’t come across the border, and they’re certainly not
trafficked, not brought across by coyotes.
McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
WILLIAMS: They’re people who come here on legal visas, and
simply overstay that visa.
McCAIN: Well, just because we have not addressed that issue,
which we can and should, doesn’t mean that we still don’t have a serious
problem with drugs coming across our borders.
WILLIAMS: But I’m saying, I’m saying, don’t you think that
that is wrong, it’s a distortion, that the Republican debate about immigration
is centered on drugs and illegal human trafficking?
McCAIN: The use of drugs, in my, in fact, I just saw a news
report, after going down some, is now on the way up again, amongst young
people. We can’t ignore that problem. That’s, that’s…
WILLIAMS: But I’m saying, isn’t that a separate problem?
McCAIN: No, I think because…
WILLIAMS: A separate issue?
McCAIN: Not as long as those drugs, the majority of ‘em are
being brought across our border, uh, illegally. Could I mention also one
historical fact? Ted Kennedy and I were doing immigration reform. It was
Senator Obama who went to the floor, and proposed an amendment which would
sunset the guest worker program that Ted Kennedy and I had agreed to, which
would’ve destroyed, uh, which was partially the reason why we destroyed
immigration reform. It was destroyed by people like then-Senator Obama on the
left, and some who are opposed to agricultural worker program, and by some on
the right who obviously called it, quote, amnesty. So, the irony of all this
is, that then-Senator Obama was part of the destruction of the effort that Ted
Kennedy and I made. But you won’t hear that very often.
WILLIAMS: Well, I think the votes, though, didn’t come from
the Republican side. President Bush was in favor of it.
McCAIN: Yes.
WILLIAMS: I believe you were in favor of it.
McCAIN: Yes.
WILLIAMS: But the defeat came from a lot of the talk radio
people on the far right, who took away Republican votes in the Congress.
McCAIN: It was a group on the far right, and it was also on
the left, the Farm Workers of America, a union, and trade unions who were
opposed to the guest worker program provision. One of… the greatness of Ted
Kennedy, as you know, was that he was willing—he and I agreed to vote against
amendments that we otherwise might support. And I saw him speak rather sternly
to then-Senator Obama, when Senator Obama proposed the amendment to quote,
sunset, in other words, end the guest worker program, but the rest of the
immigration reform continued.
WILLIAMS: And you think this will be highlighted in the
course of the campaign, by the Romney folks?
McCAIN: I don’t know, to tell you the truth.
WILLIAMS: Ah.
McCAIN: People have a tendency to forget these things, and a
lot of people don’t understand the way we work in the Senate. Whether that’s
good or bad, I don’t know.
WILLIAMS: Now you know Mitt Romney’s dad was born in Mexico.
McCAIN: Yep.
WILLIAMS: You were born in Panama, just like me.
McCAIN: Canal Zone. Yes.
WILLIAMS: Exactly. So, historically…
McCAIN: Yes. I, much long before you, I might add.
WILLIAMS: You’re a kind soul. Historically, you have been
much admired, loved…
McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
WILLIAMS: …by Latinos in your
community, in Arizona, thirty percent of the state. (YOU’RE A FOOL IF YOU
THOUGHT THAT MEXICAN, WHO BREAK EACH AND EVERY LAW IN THIS NATION, ARE ALSO NOT
VOTING IN LA RAZA SUPREMACIST!)
McCAIN: Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
WILLIAMS: But as the GOP has pulled to the right, it looks
like you have abandoned so much of your support for pro-immigrant policies. It
looks like you said, you know what, we’ve got to wait until that border is
secure, even as the border has become more secure. So, are people right to
criticize you as having abandoned the immigrant, immigrant community?
McCAIN: Well I hope not. But I do also understand, though,
that there have been increases in border security. There’s no doubt about that.
But has there been enough? As I pointed out to you, the price for an ounce of
cocaine on the street in Chicago is not one penny more than it was before we
started all this. We can use technology, we can do things that rather than just
hiring people. But right now, for example, our wildlife refuges in southern
Arizona are being destroyed. That’s something that’s a desecration of our, of
our history. So I think that, working together, we can work out immigration
reform, which has to do with guest worker programs, which has to do with past
the [LTG: sb "paths to"] citizenship, not necessarily granting
citizenship, but giving people legal status. Also, this issue of course, of
children who were brought here, has to be addressed as well. And, there will be
people on both ends of the spectrum who…
WILLIAMS: Who stand in the way.
McCAIN: Who—yeah…
WILLIAMS: Now, now people, similarly ask, why would John
McCain be supporting Jan Brewer, when you think about SB 1070, especially the
initial issue about racial profiling.
McCAIN: Mm-hmm.
WILLIAMS: People say ‘why was John McCain supporting
Governor Brewer?’ What do you say?
McCAIN: Because I
sympathized with her, and the citizens of my state that were incredibly
frustrated. We had a border patrol agent killed. We had a rancher who was
killed by drug smugglers. People were not safe in their homes, in the southern
part of our state. SB 1070, the law that was passed in Arizona, was a
direct result of the frustration that our citizens felt, because their lives,
literally in the southern part of our state, were not safe on the American side
of the border. And that was bred out of that frustration. Now, since the border
enforcement has been increased, and we have seen some improvements, you haven’t
seen nearly the fervor that you saw in the past. And by the way, on that issue,
I think it’s pretty clear from the argument that the Supreme Court members
made, that a lot of that, that law may be upheld…
WILLIAMS: So what’s your prediction…
McCAIN: …By the United States Supreme Court.
WILLIAMS: What’s your prediction on the court?
McCAIN: I think there’ll be a couple of aspects, certainly,
that’ll be upheld. If you, if a policeman arrests someone, and that person acts
in a strange fashion, to ask them to show their identification, I don’t think
is, I think the Supreme Court, that’s even, Judge Sotomayor (SOTOMAYER IS A MEMBER OF THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA
RAZA. THAT’S WHY OBAMA PUT HER ON THE COURT. SHE VOTED NO ON E-VERIFY, AS SUCH
WOULD KEEP ILLEGALS OUT OF OUR JOBS!) acted very skeptical, as to
whether that was unconstitutional or not.
WILLIAMS: And so you expect that that would be upheld, and
that…
McCAIN: I think provisions of it.
WILLIAMS: What provisions do you think will be struck down?
McCAIN: I’m not sure of all of the details, but I’m sure
that there are a couple of areas where it would probably be struck down. And,
look, I love my state. I love the people of my state. And I know that sometimes
our image is hurt by this, all this controversy that…
WILLIAMS: I was just going to ask you. Arizona’s become now
known as the anti-immigrant state. There are boycotts against Arizona.(ARIZONA IS KNOWN IN MEXICO AS THE GATEWAY FOR THE MEX
DRUG CARTELS TO THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST!)
McCAIN: Actually, those, those aren’t happening anymore, the
boycotts. Our tourism is back up, and the convention business, which is so
important, because it really is such a wonderful place for us to live and work.
But again when I go down to the southern part of my state, and I meet a group
of ranchers that say, I can’t even drop my child off at the bus stop, because…
for fear of their safety, then we have to do something about that.
WILLIAMS: But that’s a drug issue, isn’t it?
McCAIN: I’m their elected—it’s, it’s a lot to do with drugs,
and it’s got to do a lot to do with these coyotes who are bringing people
across.
WILLIAMS: The vice-presidential pick is the talk of the
town. Do you have a pick that you would suggest for Mitt Romney?
McCAIN: No, I think it would be very presumptive of the
loser to do that. But I think he has a deep bench to draw from, and obviously
the same ones that I see you discuss…
WILLIAMS: Right.
McCAIN: …On the panels, on Fox, Marco Rubio would be very
attractive, Rob Portman, Kelly Ayotte, we’ve got several governors out there,
Chris Christie, Bobby Jindal, and all of these people, by the way, say, no, no,
never, I don’t want it! You’ve got to, you’ve got to say, I don’t want it.
WILLIAMS: Right, right. Do you want…
McCAIN: …That said, yes, I want it!
WILLIAMS: That’d be…
McCAIN: Yeah.
WILLIAMS: Do you think that if Romney was to select Marco
Rubio…
McCAIN: Yeah. Yeah.
WILLIAMS: …It would impact the Latino vote that he could in
fact make inroads that would lessen the amount of support for the Democrats and
President Obama?
McCAIN: Well, first of all, I think it would help in
Florida, because Rubio is very popular in Florida, with all segments of the
population. But I think it’s bound to. But I also agree with the point that you
were making earlier, in your questioning, and that is that we need to show the
Hispanic community that we recognize that this is, in many ways, an issue of
being humane, of being understanding, of having compassion, and that, that’s,
that’s really the fundamental way, that, to, to address the issue.
WILLIAMS: You know, you earlier said, there’s so much in
common in terms of social values, between…
McCAIN: Pro-military, small business, lower taxes, pro-life,
yeah, there’s many, many, uh, common ground between ourselves—small business
men and women are huge amounts of our Latino population.
WILLIAMS: Okay, so, John McCain, Republican wise man is
talking to the Romney campaign. What’s the leverage point, where do you advise
them to go, to start to bridge, and bring those people of common value, into
touch with the Republican Party?
McCAIN: Well, Mitt Romney has said that he is in favor of
immigration reform. Now, like anything else, the devil is in the details. And
as you know, Marco Rubio is working on a version of the Dream Act to address
probably one of the most compelling aspects of all this issue, and that is,
people who came to our country, were brought, and were brought as children. So
look, Republicans can read polls just as well as Democrats, Juan. Everybody
knows that this is a serious issue, not only now, but the demographics, and
Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico…
WILLIAMS: Texas, California. Well, not, I mean…
McCAIN: Georgia! Georgia. Look at the large, fast-growing
Hispanic population in the Atlanta area. (THE MEX-OCCUPATION
EXPANDS NATIONWIDE. ILLEGALS ARE BREEDING MEXICO’S OCCUPATION BY ANCHOR BABY
BREEDING! SUCH COST LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE $600 MILLION PER YEAR)
WILLIAMS: Yeah.
McCAIN: So, we understand that. Now, the question is, are we
going to be able to really address it in a serious fashion? I believe so, and I
hope so.
WILLIAMS: But you don’t have any suggestion as to how to do
it.
McCAIN: Well, as I say, Marco Rubio is working on a… and
others are working with him on a version of the Dream Act.
WILLIAMS: But you know that he…
McCAIN: He…
WILLIAMS: …That Rubio’s proposal would not grant
citizenship, it would just allow them to stay in the country. He says he wants
to prevent chain migration. It’s not going to pass muster with most Latino
voters, who want a Dream Act that gives those young people in the military, in
school, the opportunity to be American citizens.
McCAIN: Well, first of all, I’m not sure that that’s, that
that’s the case, because I think, first of all, they do want, uh, to have a
legal status, and be able to come out of the shadows. Second of all, let me
tell you a big problem with the Dream Act. Dream Act says you can go to college
for two years—as proposed by Senator Durbin. Go to college for two years, or
serve in the military for, for two years. We don’t serve in the military for
two years. We serve in the military for four years. So what are you going to
say? And the reason why we serve for four years, it takes so long to train
them, so, anyone who joins our military. So, we’re going to say, here’s a
special category, that can, only has to serve in the military for two years?
Come on. So there’s, there’s some fundamental flaws with their version of the
Dream Act, that I think has to be addressed as well.
WILLIAMS: Senator McCain, thank you so much for coming in to
Fox News Latino.
McCAIN: Thank you for the interrogation.
WILLIAMS: The interrogation. Well, we did it in English.
McCAIN: Thanks a lot.
WILLIAMS: Thank you very much, Senator.
*
CAR THEFT IN ARIZONA UNDER
MEX-OCCUPATION:
FIGURES DATED:
(SOURCE: FORBES)
ARIZONA
In
2003, according to the Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles, 57,600 cars were
stolen in Phoenix. It is now the car-jacking capital of the world. Most were
SUV’s and pickup trucks. At a conservative average of $15,000.00 per vehicle,
owner losses exceeded $864 million. Insurance companies in the state suffered
incredible claims from policyholders. Arizona is the temporary home of 500,000
illegal aliens. They cost Arizona taxpayers over $1 billion annually in
services for schools, medical care, welfare anchor babies, loss of tax base and
prisons. Illegals use those vehicles for smuggling more people and drugs from
around the world into our country. When the vehicles are recovered, they are
smashed-up wrecks in the desert. If not found, they have new owners south of
the border as thieves drive the cars through the desert and into Mexico as
easily as you drive your kids to soccer practice.
*
HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE
FOR EVERY COUNTY IN THE U.S. TO PAY OUT FOR MEXICO’S ANCHOR BABY BREEDING
PROGRAM? NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED TO BE MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE!
JUDICIAL WATCH
SANCTUARY COUNTY LOS ANGELES SPENDS $600 MILLION ON WELFARE
FOR ILLEGALS
County Spends $600 Mil On
Welfare For Illegal Immigrants
Last
Updated: Thu, 03/11/2010 - 3:14pm
For
the second consecutive year taxpayers in a single U.S. county will dish out
more than half a billion dollars just to cover the welfare and food-stamp costs
of illegal immigrants.
Los
Angeles County, the nation’s most populous, may be in the midst of a dire
financial crisis but somehow there are plenty of funds for illegal aliens. In
January alone, anchor babies born to the county’s illegal immigrants collected
more than $50 million in welfare benefits. At that
rate the cash-strapped county will pay around $600 million this year to provide
illegal aliens’ offspring with food stamps and other welfare perks.
THE EXORBITANT
FIGURE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ENORMOUS COST OF EDUCATING, MEDICALLY TREATING, OR
INCARCERATING ILLEGALS ALIENS. THIS COSTS THE COUNTY AN ADDITIONAL ONE BILLION
DOLLARS.
The
exorbitant figure, revealed this week by a county supervisor, doesn’t even
include the enormous cost of educating, medically treating or incarcerating
illegal aliens in the sprawling county of about 10 million residents. Los
Angeles County annually spends more than $1 billion for those combined services,
including $500 million for healthcare and $350 million for public safety.
About
a quarter of the county’s welfare and food stamp issuances go to parents who
reside in the United States illegally and collect benefits for their anchor
babies, according to the figures from the county’s Department of Social
Services. In 2009 the tab ran $570 million and this year’s figure is expected
to increase by several million dollars.
Illegal immigration continues to have a “catastrophic
impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” the veteran county
supervisor (Michael Antonovich) who revealed the information has said. The former fifth-grade
history teacher has repeatedly come under fire from his liberal counterparts
for publicizing statistics that confirm the devastation illegal immigration has
had on the region. Antonovich, who has served on the board for nearly three
decades, represents a portion of the county that is roughly twice the size of
Rhode Island and has about 2 million residents.
His
district is simply a snippet of a larger crisis. Nationwide, Americans pay
around $22 billion annually to provide illegal immigrants with welfare benefits
that include food assistance programs such as free school lunches in public
schools, food stamps and a nutritional program (known as WIC)
for low-income women and their children. Tens of billions more are spent on
other social services, medical care, public education and legal costs such as
incarceration and public defenders.
*
Anchor Babies Grab One Quarter of
Welfare Dollars in LA Co
The anchor baby scam has proven lucrative for illegal aliens in Los Angeles
County, at considerable cost to our own poor and downtrodden legal citizenry.
The numbers show that more than $50 million in CalWORKS benefits and food
stamps for January went to children born in the United States whose parents are
in the country without documentation. This represents approximately 23 percent
of the total benefits under the state welfare and food stamp programs,
Antonovich said.
"When you add this to $350 million for public safety and nearly $500
million for health care, the total cost for illegal immigrants to county
taxpayers far exceeds $1 billion a year -- not including the millions of
dollars for education," Antonovich said.
I love children and I'm all for compassion -- smart, teach-them-to-fish
compassion. But when laws, the Constitution, and enforcement allow illegal
aliens (the operative word here being "illegal") to insinuate
themselves into our nation and bleed us of our precious financial resources,
then laws, the Constitution and enforcement need to be changed.
*
WHO REALLY PAYS FOR THE MEX
WELFARE STATE? NOT THE EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGALS! NOT MEXICO! WE ARE MEXICO’S
WELFARE SYSTEM.
GOP
push to revise 14th Amendment not gaining steam
By
Sandhya Somashekhar
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 8, 2010; A04
South Carolina Sen. Lindsey O. Graham
(R) says America faces a new and growing foreign threat: illegal immigrants and
tourists who come to here for the express purpose of giving birth so their
children obtain citizenship.
Sen. John McCain
(R-Ariz.) and other top Republicans quickly jumped on the issue and called for
hearings.
The senators
said their concerns arose from recent reports of a burgeoning "birth
tourism" industry, which helps expectant mothers abroad travel to the
United States to deliver their babies. They also said that birthright
citizenship, which is granted by the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, could
provide an incentive for people to enter the country illegally.
The
sudden support cheered anti-immigration hard-liners who have been pushing to do
away with birthright citizenship for years, but the senators face a problem:
Few others want to take up the issue, and it is almost assuredly going nowhere.
Even
some of the most vocal critics of the country's permissive immigration laws are
skeptical of the efforts, which they say are particularly emotionally charged
because they affect children and families.
"We
don't think that it is worth the political capital to initiate a debate on this
issue," said Jon Feere, legal policy analyst for the Center for
Immigration Studies, a think tank that backs stricter immigration policies.
"The energy spent on ending birthright citizenship might be better spent
reducing illegal immigration through a commitment to immigration law
enforcement generally. If illegal immigration is ended, the problem of
birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens disappears."
Nevertheless,
raising the issue could prove beneficial to Graham and McCain, both of whom
have rocky relationships with many of the conservatives whose support they'll
need to stay in office.
Graham
has fallen out of favor with many in his party for working with Democrats on a
host of issues, including immigration. He was just one of five Republicans to
vote last week to confirm Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court, a decision that further raises the
possibility that he will face a serious primary challenge when his term runs
out in four years.
McCain's
concern is more immediate -- he faces voters in a primary later this month and
is on the ballot again in November.
"My
organization would say there should be a change on the horizon, but not in the
way Lindsey Graham is talking about it," said Rosemary Jenks, director of
governmental relations for the nonprofit NumbersUSA, the leading group opposed
to birthright citizenship. "I do think it is political. . . . What we need
is a serious discussion of the actual issues, not a lot of political ploys.
"
Bills
related to birthright citizenship have been introduced in Congress every year
since the 1990s, experts say. They almost never gain traction and rarely
attract high-profile supporters such as Graham and McCain. When the issued was
raised this year, Senate Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell
(R-Ky.) as well as Sens. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) and Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said they, too, would be open to hearings.
On
Fox News late last month, Graham said he might propose a constitutional
amendment because birthright citizenship has become a magnet for illegal
immigration. "To have a child in America, they cross the border, go to the
emergency room, have a child and that child is automatically an American
citizen," he told host Greta Van Susteren. "That shouldn't be the
case. That attracts people here for all the wrong reasons."
Amending
the Constitution is a difficult task. Some who support curbing birthright
citizenship argue that the 14th Amendment has been misinterpreted and that the
issue could be dealt with more simply by passing a law or through the courts.
"This
is a symptom of the larger problem of illegal immigration in this
country," Jenks said. "It is an important issue. This is part of our
identity as a nation, and we're the only industrialized country that has not
changed its birthright citizenship laws."
More
troubling to some is that illegal immigrants often further root themselves in
U.S. society by having American children, their plight often winning the
sympathy of the public. In one widely publicized case in 2007, a Mexican woman
barricaded herself and her 8-year-old son, who was a U.S. citizen, inside a
Chicago church in an unsuccessful attempt to avoid deportation.
Immigrant
rights advocates say birthright citizenship is beneficial to society because it
promotes assimilation, and that revoking that right could create generations of
residents who reside in the country illegally.
"It's
puzzling that they would propose this, because it would add to the undocumented
population," said Bill O. Hing, a professor at the University of San
Francisco School of Law who has represented undocumented immigrants. "I
really think they lose sight of who these children are and what they become. .
. . They very quickly become assimilated."
*
JOHN McCAIN: Unofficial Agent
For Mexico?
Or just one more HISPANDERING
POLITICIAN?
REALITY ON JOHN “McAmnesty”
“(Amnesty)
It will be my top priority yesterday, today and tomorrow.” John McCain
McCain claimed he finally heard
the people. There would be no McAmensty. Then he embraced the racist Mexican
supremacist political party of the Mexican occupiers LA RAZA.
McCain’s OPEN BORDERS MEXICAN, JUAN
HERNANDEZ IS AN AGENT FOR THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT, AND A MEMBER OF THE MEXICAN
NAZI PARTY of LA RAZA. HIS BOOK:
MEXICAN SUPREMACIST
M.E.Ch.A. PARTY MEMBER JUAN WILLIAMS:
The "New American
Pioneers" proclaimed in his book are the illegal alien invaders he urges
to become settlers in the USA. Hernandez believes all Mexicans and
Mexican-Americans in the USA should become dual citizens and consider
themselves Mexicans first, "to the 8th generation." He believes there
should be no border at all between Mexico and the USA, ever. And this is the
man McCain chose for his "Hispanic Outreach Director." When McCain
was asked about this choice, he said he chose Hernandez because he agrees with
his positions. If so, McCain is supporting invasion and reconquista.
*
Lou Dobbs
Tonight
Tuesday July 8, 2008
Sens.
McCain and Obama are fiercely courting the Latino vote. Last month they spoke
to the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials; today
it’s the League of United Latin American Citizens’ national convention; and
this weekend they’re set to address the National Council of La Raza, one of the
most radical socioethnocentric interest groups in the country.
A SMALL GLIMPSE OF THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION IN
McCAIN’S STATE OF ARIZONA:
(SINCE THIS ARTICLE WAS PUBLISHED, OBAMA’S DEPT. of LA
RAZA JUSTICE HAS ARMED THE MEX DRUG CARTELS, SUED AZ ON BEHALF OF OBAMA’S LA
RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS, SUED AZ TO STOP E-VERIFY TO EASE MORE ILLEGALS
INTO AMERICAN JOBS, AND SABOTAGED AZ BORDERS
WITH NARCOMEX!
*
JOHN
“McAMNESTY” McCAIN’S STATE OF ARIZONA.... here’s what the Mexican invasion
looks like there:
In
2003, according to the Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles, 57,600 cars were
stolen in Phoenix. It is now the car‑jacking capital of the world. Most were
SUV’s and pickup trucks. At a conservative average of $15,000.00 per vehicle,
owner losses exceeded $864 million. Insurance companies in the state suffered
incredible claims from policyholders.
Arizona
is the temporary home of 500,000 illegal aliens. They cost Arizona taxpayers
over $1 billion annually in services for schools, medical care, welfare anchor
babies, loss of tax base and prisons. Illegals use those vehicles for smuggling
more people and drugs from around the world into our country. When the vehicles
are recovered, they are smashed‑up wrecks in the desert. If not found, they
have new owners south of the border as thieves drive the cars through the
desert and into Mexico as easily as you drive your kids to soccer practice.
Illegal aliens displaced American workers
at a cost in excess of $133 billion dollars last year according to Harvard
Professor George Borjas. American citizens: College and high school kids cannot
find a summer job in yard care, landscape, fast food or service jobs. Why?
Illegal aliens work them at a third the wage and often, under the table.
Not
only do young American not have jobs; their parents are paying taxes for
illegal aliens who are not paying taxes.
Annually, 75 percent of drugs arrive from
Mexico at a net cost of $120 billion hard currency that leaves our country for
good. In addition, our tax dollars pay $80 billion for the War on Drugs each
year. It is a war that hasn’t been won in the past 30 years and drugs are as
available today to your teenager as they were in 1970.
When
an alien criminal gets caught for rape, murder or drug distribution, you pay
$1.6 billion annually in prison costs to house, feed and clothe those filling
30 percent of our federal and state prisons—not to mention TV, movies, weight
rooms and other entertainment—they enjoy while being incarcerated.
Over 300,000 women annually arrive pregnant
and drop them on U.S. soil. The American taxpayer pays for food, housing,
medical and schooling for them to age 18 PLUS their mother. According to the
Center for Immigration Studies, average annual cost per child K‑12 is $7,161.00
and exceeds $109 billion annually per cycle of anchor babies.
The
average head of household illegal alien costs you $2,700.00 in welfare money
over and above any taxes he or she pays in their meager paying jobs. With 15 to
20 million illegal aliens in the USA, that figures exceeds $20 billion of your
tax dollars. (Source: Center for Immigration Studies, August 2004)
How
about the $56 billion in pure cash illegal migrants sent to their home
countries last year and every year? That’s after their kids enjoyed free
education, free lunches, and free medical care paid for by you.
*
LIKE
MOST POLITICIANS, McCAIN DOESN’T GIVE A FUCK WHAT HIS CONSTITUENTS THINK IN
ARIZONA. NOR DOES HE CARE ABOUT THE LAWS ILLEGALS THAT HE IS ENCOURAGING TO HOP
OUR BORDERS BREAK. HE KNOWS THAT HE MUST KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED WITH HORDES OF
ILLEGALS SO HIS WALL ST PAYMASTERS’ PROFITS ARE GREATER AND THEY ARE THEREFORE
MORE GENEROUS. IT’S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED!
“(Amnesty)
It will be my top priority yesterday, today and tomorrow.” John McCain
By
Stephen Dinan - Sen. John McCain said yesterday that Republicans have shed
support among Hispanic voters because of the party's get-tough approach to
illegal immigration, but he predicted that his enforcement-then- legalization
approach will rebuild those bridges. Using a Mexican holiday, Cinco de Mayo, as
a launching point, Mr. McCain's presidential campaign announced a
Spanish-language Web site (www.johnmccain.com/ espanol), and said the senator
from Arizona will speak to this year's National
Council of La Raza convention in San Diego in July to try to court Hispanic
voters. "I believe the majority of the Hispanics share our view that the
border must be secured, and the border must be secured first. But they also
want us to have an attitude, which I think most Americans do, that these are
God's children, and they must be taken care of, and the issue must be addressed
in a humane and compassionate fashion," Mr. McCain told reporters at an
Arizona news conference yesterday. Hispanic support for President Bush in the
2004 election topped 40 percent by most estimates, but has fallen in the wake
of the congressional immigration debate. Now, nearly a year after the Senate
rejected the immigration legalization bill supported by Mr. McCain, Mr. Bush
and Democratic leaders, the issue is rising again, but a viable solution seems
no closer. House Democrats want a compromise that would allow more foreign
workers for farms, high-tech firms and seasonal businesses, but the
Congressional Hispanic Caucus has said it will oppose such a bill unless it
also allows for some form of legal status for current illegal immigrants.
Meanwhile, a vocal group of conservative Democrats and Republicans is demanding
an enforcement-only approach. Today, the House will hold a hearing on an
enforcement bill that would require employers to check a government database
known as the E-Verify system before they hire. That bill is sponsored by Rep.
Heath Shuler, a North Carolina Democrat who has broken with his party's general
stance on immigration, and is backed by House Republicans who are running a
petition drive to try to force a floor vote on the measure. Yesterday, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services announced it was adding new databases to
the E-Verify system to reduce false hits for naturalized citizens whose
work-authorization records aren't up-to-date. That should cut more than half of
false hits, agency officials said. Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican
presidential nominee, has tried to straddle the line on immigration after his
support for legalizing illegal immigrants nearly cost him the nomination. In
2006 and 2007, he was a chief backer, along with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy,
Massachusetts Democrat, of a bill to legalize most illegal immigrants and to
dramatically boost immigration. Last year, that bill failed when a majority of
senators joined a filibuster to block it. Some opponents said the bill amounted
to a lenient "amnesty," while others called it too harsh. Mr. McCain
said the bill failed because voters didn't trust the government to handle the
security side. Since then, he has said his first priority would be to secure
the borders and require border state governors to certify that before turning
his attention to a legalization program for the country's illegal immigrants.
The Democratic National Committee said he will have to choose between enforcement
or legalization. The Democratic presidential candidates, Sen. Hillary Rodham
Clinton of New York and Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, have said they would
allow for legalization. "It's hard to know what someone's real vision for
our country is when they consistently take every side of the issues," said
DNC spokesman Luis Miranda. "John McCain cannot have it both ways. He
cannot pander to the right wing of his party by promising an enforcement-only
approach to immigration while telling Hispanics that he supports comprehensive
reform." Immigration advocates said an enforcement-first approach is still
too harsh.
"Anti-immigrant-light
is no more acceptable than anti-immigrant," said Eliseo Medina,
international executive vice president of the Service Employees International
Union, who added that the proper solution was to offer legal status across the
board. "Let's legalize everybody,
and then let's figure out what we need to do to ensure we have a legal program
going forward." Mr. McCain has acknowledged his close call with voters
on this issue in the primaries. Asked whether he feared voter backlash again in
the general election, the senator said that's out of his hands. "I don't
know, but I can't worry about that," he said.
THESE
FIGURES ARE DATED! ILLEGALS NOW DEPRESS WAGES FROM $300 TO $400 BILLION PER
YEAR.