America Faces No Greater Threat Than Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Their Assault to Our Borders Is As Great As Their Assault to Free Speech and Free Elections
Friday, August 31, 2012
Automakers ramping up more auto imports from Mexico - THE FUCKERS OBAMA BAILED OUT ARE CREATING JOBS IN MEXICO!
News analysis: Mitt Romney leads unified GOP into battle – USATODAY.com - BUT ILLEGALS SAY THEY WILL VOTE AGAIN FOR OBAMA - The Great Hispanderer
News analysis: Mitt Romney leads unified GOP into battle – USATODAY.com
OBAMA HAS ALWAYS BEEN AWOL ON JOBS… UNLESS THEY’RE FOR
ILLEGALS!
TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA ‘THE RACE’ PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS,
OBAMA HAS SABOTAGED E-VERIFY, SUED AZ, A STATE UNDER MEX SIEGE, TO BLOCK
E-VERIFY, HAS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS AS HIS SEC. of (illegal) LABOR!
*
THE
ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming
the jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of
Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama
is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president
should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs
they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."
*
President Obama is AWOL on the biggest
issue of all JOBS!
Published
August 23, 2012
|
FoxNews.com
advertisement
Thursday’s jobless numbers and Wednesday’s CBO report are beyond ominous and present a direct
challenge to the rationale for Barack Obama’s presidency.
Before
President Obama took office, he vilified
President Bush for adding $4 trillion to our nation’s debt as “unpatriotic.” If Bush’s spending
over the course of two terms was “unpatriotic,” Obama adding nearly $5.3
trillion to the national debt in half this time is not only “unpatriotic,” it’s
also hypocritical. It displays an utter disregard for financial health of
this country.
Obama pledged
to cut the deficit in half by 2012, but instead has increased spending so rapidly
that our nation has surpassed the $16 trillion threshold. He and his
ObamaClones in the Senate continue to call for even more liberal
deficit spending.
Senate
Democrats have enabled Obama by refusing to produce a budget for over three
years. This is a complete dereliction of duty on the part of Majority Leader Harry
Reid. The Senate is mandated to produce a budget but has failed to do so
for almost the entire time Obama has been in office.
Democratic
Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia expressed rare honesty in saying he was at
a loss to explain why his fellow Democrats have gone along with this. The
former governor even said if he had done this while governor of his state, he
would’ve been impeached.
It’s
an absolute disgrace that the last time the Senate passed a budget was on April 29,
2009. Since this resolution—which aimed to cut the deficit by two-thirds by
2014—the deficit has increased by $4.8 trillion.
Obama and
his enablers in the Senate refuse to do their jobs and idly stand by as our
nation teeters on the fiscal cliff. The American people not only deserve
to know how the politicians in Washington are spending their tax dollars, they
also deserve representatives who do the job they were elected to do.
Do we
need more evidence that Obama doesn’t take fiscal responsibility
seriously? His last budget proposal was shot down by both Democrats and
Republicans in both houses of Congress: 414-0 in the House of Representatives
and 99-0 in the Senate. When was the last time—if ever—you had a national,
unanimous repudiation of this magnitude?
Both
Obama and Reid must be held accountable for failing to do their jobs. The
same goes for other enablers in the Senate such as Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), Claire
McCaskill (D-Mo.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) – all of
whom are up for re-election this year.
Additionally,
former Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine (D-Va.) is running for
the Senate in Virginia, and he has continually supported all of Obama’s
policies which have driven our country deeper in debt. Mr. Kaine needs to
answer for this if he wants the voters to support him. He is not exempt.
Obama
declared that Stimulus One (a trillion dollars of taxpayer money) would get the
economy back on track. It was a miserable failure. When that didn’t
work, he threw more tax dollars at more failed projects in Stimulus Two.
Back in
February 2009, Obama said that as president he would be held accountable.
He said that if the economy didn’t recover in three years, his
presidency would be a “one-term proposition.”
Come
November, the American people will remember Obama’s proclamation. They
will also remember that this administration has engaged in the most reckless
deficit spending in history which has grown the federal debt over $16
trillion.
At some
point, the public’s patience will wear out unless Obama changes his spending
ways and both he and his party begin to take this problem seriously.
Don’t bet on this. You’ll be as successful as Obama and the Democrats
have been lately.
Brent
Bozell is chairman and CEO of ForAmerica.org, the largest online
conservative army in America with 2.5 million supporters.
*
LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS, SEC.
OF DEPT OF LABOR.
Michelle Malkin
LA RAZA HILDA SOLIS - The U.S.
Department of Illegal Alien Labor
President Obama's Labor Secretary Hilda
Solis is supposed to represent American workers. What you need to know is that
this longtime open--borders sympathizer has always had a rather radical
definition of "American." At a Latino voter registration project
conference in Los Angeles many years ago, Solis asserted to thunderous
applause, "We are all Americans, whether you are legalized or not."
That's right. The woman in charge of
enforcing our employment laws doesn't give a hoot about our immigration laws
---- or about the fundamental distinction between those who followed the rules
in pursuit of the American dream and those who didn't.
*
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH .org
*
Labor Secretary Pledges Help For
Illegal Workers
Last Updated: Tue,
06/22/2010 - 11:00am
Two
months after the Department of Labor launched a special program to assist and
protect illegal immigrants in the U.S. the Obama cabinet official who heads the
agency is personally encouraging undocumented workers to report employers that
don’t pay them fairly.
In
a Spanish-language public service announcement, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis
assures that “every worker in America has a right to be paid fairly, whether
documented or not.” Illegal aliens who are not getting fair wages are
encouraged to call a new hotline set up by the agency on a new “Podemos Ayudar” (We
Can Help) web page designed to administer worker protection laws and ensure
that employees are properly paid “regardless of immigration status.”
In
the short video, also posted in English, Solis tells illegal immigrants that
it’s a “serious problem” when workers in this country are not paid fairly and
that all workers have the right to receive their salary regardless of
immigration status. She encourages those who are not to call the new hotline
and assures it’s free and confidential. “Podemos ayudar,” (we can help), Solis
guarantees at the end of the brief segment.
The
Labor Secretary’s new message is part of a campaign launched a few months ago
to help illegal immigrant workers in the U.S., who she refers to as “vulnerable” and
“underpaid.” At least 1,000 new
field investigators have been deployed to reach out to Latino laborers in areas
with large numbers of illegal alien employees and the agency will focus on
enforcing labor and wage laws in industries that typically hire lots of illegal
aliens without reporting anyone to federal immigration authorities.
For
a government agency to protect law breakers in this fashion may seem unbelievable
but not if you consider the source. A Former California congresswoman, Solis
has close ties to the influential La Raza movement that advocates open borders
and rights for illegal immigrants. She made the protection of undocumented
workers a major priority upon being named Labor Secretary, assuring illegal
aliens that “if you work in this country, you are protected by our laws.”
"While the declining job market in
the United States may be discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of
illegal aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United States as
drug-smuggling "mules."
*
OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA –
HOW DOES HE EXPLAIN THAT TO BLACK AMERICA? HE DOESN’T BOTHER!
*
*
Newsmax
Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America
Monday, January 10, 2011 08:28 AM
By: James Walsh
Casting a shadow on economic recovery efforts
in the United States is the cost of illegal immigration that consumes U.S.
taxpayer dollars for education, healthcare, social welfare benefits, and
criminal justice. Illegal aliens (or more politically correct,
"undocumented immigrants") with ties to Mexican drug cartels are
contributing to death and destruction on U.S. lands along the southern border.
While the declining job market in the
United States may be discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of
illegal aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United States as
drug-smuggling "mules."
Increasingly vicious foot soldiers of
the Mexican drug cartels are taking control of U.S. lands along the border,
especially since U.S. Border Patrol units have been reassigned, some to offices
60 to 80 miles inland.
The U.S. Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) early last year posted signs warning citizens
to avoid Interstate 8 between Casa Grande and Gila Bend, Ariz., because of
criminal activity in the area, an area that includes protected natural areas
precious to the nation.
In reaction to public outrage over the
signs, the BLM removed the offensive wording in October 2010, replacing it with
the following: Visitor Information Update--Active Federal Law Enforcement
Patrol Area.
As the liberal news media, far-left
Democrats, and labor unions push for the "Hispanicazation" of U.S.
culture, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says
the U.S. border has never been more secure.
Perhaps she is basing this on the
reduced number of apprehensions, which result, of course, from reassigning
Border Patrol agents inland.
In a recent New York Times article,
Nicholas Kristof criticized U.S. citizens for not speaking a foreign language
and suggested that "Every child in the United States should learn
Spanish." He concluded that as the United States increasingly integrates
economically with Latin America, Spanish will be crucial for the United States.
For decades, the liberal left has
argued that Latin America is essential for U.S. business and trade. Kristof
states that Latin America "is finally getting its act together" but
fails to mention the Obama administration's $2 billion loan of U.S. taxpayer
money in 2009 to Brazil's Petrobras oil company for deep off-shore oil
drilling. Obama confidant George Soros, through the Soros Fund Management LLC,
until recently owned millions of dollars of Petrobras stock.
Kristof suggests that one day
Spanish-speaking Americans will be part of daily life in the United States and
that workmen such as mechanics will be able to communicate easily with
Spanish-speaking customers.
He fails to explain why these customers
will not be speaking English. After all, the ability to speak, read, and write
English remains a requirement for U.S. citizenship.
President Barack Obama gives lip
service to increasing border control resources with limited funding and
personnel. Many officials, including the governors of Texas and Arizona, are
skeptical regarding the Obama administration's resolve. They resent that the
United States is being blamed for the killing fields on both sides of the
Mexico-U.S. Border.
For instance, U.S. Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton in March 2009, during her first official visit to Mexico,
placed the blame for the Mexican drug cartels' vicious murders on the United
States.
In Mexico City, she announced that the
U.S. appetite for illegal drugs and the easy acquisition of guns from the
United States by Mexicans are the root causes of the Mexican crime wave.
"Blame America" has become the global agenda of the Democratic Party.
The Obama administration's plan to
resolve the immigration chaos is to offer amnesty to all comers. President
Obama re-affirms his support of a "pathway to citizenship" (amnesty)
for illegal aliens in 2011.
The administration, however, has
announced no plans to control the influx of future waves of illegal aliens or
their skyrocketing costs to the nation. The administration, which condones U.S.
sanctuary cities and states, has no plans to file charges against them for
violations of federal immigration law. Nor does the administration seem
concerned about the environmental impact that illegal aliens have on the
ecology of the United States.
Many national forests, parks,
monuments, wilderness areas, and wildlife refuges -- once the pride of the
nation -- are serving today as marijuana fields for illegal alien gangs.
Former Democratic Speaker of the House
Nancy Pelosi reportedly said to a gathering of illegal aliens in California in
2009 that U.S. immigration laws were "un-American," suggesting that
they need not be obeyed. Concerned citizens can only trust that the new speaker
of the House, John Boehner, as part of congressional oversight of federal
agencies, will demand enforcement of existing immigration laws.
When will President Obama recognize
that illegal immigration is slowing economic recovery? Can he resolve the chaos
while still appeasing his Hispanic base?
To maintain his populist aura, the
president is in the habit of saying one thing to one audience and the opposite
to another.
One Obama apologist explained,
"Campaign rhetoric is one thing," suggesting that governing is
another. The deliberate Hispanicazation of the United States to secure a block
of votes is quite another.
*
THE
ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We
could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal
workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the
Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the
American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help
citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than
fail to enforce immigration laws."
Feds shut down criminal investigation of Arpaio; no charges to be filed - WILL OBAMA EVER STOP HIS ASSAULT ON AMERICANS IN ARIZONA?
Feds shut down criminal investigation of Arpaio; no charges to be filed
Read more: http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/2010/06/what-ever-happened-to-american-soil.php#ixzz0s4r1zoLa
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Do-Latinos-take-priority-over-whites-in-Arizona-92865714.html#ixzz0nm76p5ea
Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Obama Administration Challenges
Arizona E-Verify Law
The
Obama administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a 2007 Arizona law that punishes employers who
hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor Janet Napolitano. (Solicitor
General's Amicus Curiae Brief). Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law
requires all employers in Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the
business licenses of those who hire illegal workers shall be repealed.
From the date of enactment, the Chamber of Commerce and other special interest
groups have been trying to undo it, attacking it through a failed ballot
initiative and also through a lawsuit. Now the Chamber is asking the United
States Supreme Court to hear the case (Chamber of Commerce v. Candelaria),
and the Obama Administration is weighing in against the law.
To
date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has been upheld by all lower courts, including the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as
an exercise of a state’s traditional power to regulate businesses. (San Francisco
Chronicle,
June 2, 2010). Obama’s Justice Department, however, disagrees. Acting
Solicitor General Neal Katyal said in his filing with the Supreme Court that
the lower courts were wrong to uphold the statute because federal immigration
law expressly preempts any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring
illegal immigrants. Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a licensing law,
but “a statute that prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens and uses suspension
and revocation of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate sanction.” (Solicitor
General's Amicus Curiae Brief, p. 10). This is the administration’s first court
challenge to a state’s authority to act against illegal immigration, and could
be a preview of the battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration
crackdown through SB 1070.
Napolitano
has made no comment on the Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the
2007 law, but federal officials said that she has taken an active part in the
debate over whether to do so. (Politico, May 28, 2010).
As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed the state law was valid
and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it. (Id.).
*
Obama soft on illegals enforcement
Arrests of illegal immigrant
workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures
released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and
convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50
percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders
(Article)
*
OBAMA PUT A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST IN AS SEC. OF LABOR TO ASSURE ILLEGALS GET
OUR JOBS FIRST!
“Labor
Secretary Hilda Solis, a former California congresswoman with close ties to the
influential La Raza movement, announced the “We Can Help” project with great fanfare a few days ago.”
*
THE
OBAMA LA RAZA INFESTED ASSAULT ON LEGALS OF THE STATE of ARIZONA ON BEHALF OF
HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS!
WHY
HASN’T OBAMA BEEN IMPEACHED FOR BEING AN AGENT OF MEXICAN INTERESTS?
OBAMA IGNORES PLEAS
FOR NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS
Lawmakers from states bordering Mexico are ticked off. More
than a year after they asked the White House for National Guard troops to be
deployed there, the Obama administration still has not formally responded.
In March 2009, governors of Texas and Arizona -- along with
many of their states' Capitol Hill legislators -- pleaded with the White House to better secure their citizens and
businesses from the swelling tide of smugglers, illegal immigrants and Mexican
drug-war violence spilling over the border.
Topics: Illegal Immigration, President Obama, request
National Guard troops, border violence, smugglers
May 8, 2010
Scripps Howard News
Sun-Times Media, LLC
The administration promised to study the request and get
back to them.
They didn't, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Arizona Gov. Jan
Brewer say. Last month, Brewer
complained that she had pleaded five times in letters to President Obama for
more federal muscle, to no avail.
The administration says it has not been ignoring the border
problems, noting that there now are airborne drones conducting surveillance
flights; a full complement of 20,000 Border Patrol agents; a 653-mile border
fence in place, and about $70 million sent in law-enforcement aid.
The governors say the border area remains unacceptably
dangerous, citing the March murder of an Arizona rancher and the wounding of an
Arizona deputy this month.
U.S. Senators John McCain and Jon Kyl, both Arizona
Republicans, issued an urgent request
*
OBAMA’S ATTORNEY GENERAL SAYS JUSTICE MAY SUE ARIZONA OVER
NEW IMMIGRATION LAW…. Which Only Mirrors EXISTING FEDERAL UNENFORCED LAW!!!
Attorney General Eric Holder says the
Justice Department may sue Arizona over its new immigration law.
Washington (CNN) -- Attorney General Eric Holder said Sunday that the Justice Department was considering a federal lawsuit against Arizona's new immigration law.
"We are considering all of our options. One possibility is filing a lawsuit," Holder told NBC's "Meet the Press." Possible grounds for the lawsuit would be whether the Arizona law could lead to civil rights violations, he said.
By the CNN Wire Staff
May 9, 2010
The recently enacted Arizona law initially allowed police to ask anyone for proof of legal U.S. residency, based solely on a police officer's suspicion that the person might be in the country illegally. Arizona lawmakers soon amended the law so that officers could check a person's status only if the person had been stopped or arrested for another reason.
Critics say the law will lead to racial profiling, while supporters say it involves no racial profiling and is needed to crack down on increasing crime involving illegal immigrants.
In Arizona, the city councils of Tucson and Flagstaff have decided to challenge the new immigration law in court.
Holder told ABC's "This Week" program that one concern about the Arizona law is that "you'll end up in a situation where people are racially profiled, and that could lead to a wedge drawn between certain communities and law enforcement, which leads to the problem of people in those communities not willing to interact with people in law enforcement, not willing to share information, not willing to be witnesses where law enforcement needs them."
"I think we could potentially get on a slippery slope where people will be picked on because of how they look as opposed to what they have done, and that is, I think, something that we have to try to avoid at all costs," Holder added.
Holder said comprehensive federal immigration reform is the best approach for the problem of illegal immigrants crossing U.S. borders. His stance echoed the approach favored by President Obama, who last week criticized the Arizona law and said he wants Congress to work on the issue this year.
Comprehensive immigration reform would include continuing government efforts to secure borders from illegal immigrants, as well as steps to crack down on businesses that employ them, Obama said at a Cinco de Mayo celebration at the White House.
In addition, he said, those living illegally in the United States would have to pay a penalty and any taxes they owe, learn English and "make themselves right with the law" before starting the process of gaining U.S. citizenship.
Washington (CNN) -- Attorney General Eric Holder said Sunday that the Justice Department was considering a federal lawsuit against Arizona's new immigration law.
"We are considering all of our options. One possibility is filing a lawsuit," Holder told NBC's "Meet the Press." Possible grounds for the lawsuit would be whether the Arizona law could lead to civil rights violations, he said.
By the CNN Wire Staff
May 9, 2010
The recently enacted Arizona law initially allowed police to ask anyone for proof of legal U.S. residency, based solely on a police officer's suspicion that the person might be in the country illegally. Arizona lawmakers soon amended the law so that officers could check a person's status only if the person had been stopped or arrested for another reason.
Critics say the law will lead to racial profiling, while supporters say it involves no racial profiling and is needed to crack down on increasing crime involving illegal immigrants.
In Arizona, the city councils of Tucson and Flagstaff have decided to challenge the new immigration law in court.
Holder told ABC's "This Week" program that one concern about the Arizona law is that "you'll end up in a situation where people are racially profiled, and that could lead to a wedge drawn between certain communities and law enforcement, which leads to the problem of people in those communities not willing to interact with people in law enforcement, not willing to share information, not willing to be witnesses where law enforcement needs them."
"I think we could potentially get on a slippery slope where people will be picked on because of how they look as opposed to what they have done, and that is, I think, something that we have to try to avoid at all costs," Holder added.
Holder said comprehensive federal immigration reform is the best approach for the problem of illegal immigrants crossing U.S. borders. His stance echoed the approach favored by President Obama, who last week criticized the Arizona law and said he wants Congress to work on the issue this year.
Comprehensive immigration reform would include continuing government efforts to secure borders from illegal immigrants, as well as steps to crack down on businesses that employ them, Obama said at a Cinco de Mayo celebration at the White House.
In addition, he said, those living illegally in the United States would have to pay a penalty and any taxes they owe, learn English and "make themselves right with the law" before starting the process of gaining U.S. citizenship.
*
HOW MANY AMERICANS
MURDERED BY ILLEGALS SINCE THIS LOU DOBBS BROADCAST?
PHOENIX ARIZONA – MEXICAN KIDNAPPING
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Since Mexican President Felipe Calderon started his
crackdown on drug cartels and corrupt law enforcement two years ago, more than
4,000 people have been killed. The death toll among law
enforcement has topped 500. Kidnappings
and violence are spreading across the border, and now the AP reports Mexican
cartels have green-lighted hits against targets in the U.S. We’ll talk
to Phoenix police about becoming the kidnapping capital of the nation and the
rapid increase in other crimes linked to Mexico the city is coping with.
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, June 16, 2008
Tonight, we’ll have
all the latest on the devastating floods in the Midwest and all the day’s news
from the campaign trail. The massive corporate mouthpiece the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce is holding a “North American Forum” to lay out its “shared vision” for
the United States, Canada and Mexico – which is to say a borderless,
pro-business super-state in which U.S. sovereignty will be dissolved.
Undercover investigators have found incredibly lax security and enforcement at
U.S. border crossings, according to a new report by the Government
Accountability Office. This report comes on the heels of a separate report by
U.C. San Diego that shows tougher border security efforts aren’t deterring
illegal entries to the United States.
*
THE FIGURE BELOW IS DATED. CNN
REPORTS THERE ARE MORE THAN A MILLION MEX GANG MEMBERS LOOTING IN OUR BORDERS.
ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN
KAMALA HARRIS , A LA RAZA DEM FOR OPEN BORDERS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN
MEXIFORNIA ARE BY MEX GANGS.
THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 2,000
CALIFORNIANS MURDERED BY MEXICANS THAT FLED BACK OVER THE BORDER TO AVOID
PROSECUTION.
YOU REALLY WANT AMNESTY, OPEN
BORDERS AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY?
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
And there are some 800,000 gang members in this country: That’s
more than the combined number of troops in our Army and Marine Corps. These
gangs have become one of the principle ways to import and distribute drugs in
the United States. Congressman David Reichert joins Lou to tell us why those
gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why he’s introduced legislation to
eliminate the top three international drug gangs.
*
So, we have
Mexican gangs virtually controlling parts of the United States and making
threats against American law enforcement officials, but does it stop there? Of
course not. Mexico is
also SUING Arizona over its new
illegal immigration law.
Our country is
being occupied!!!! That sentence alone should be a ringing call for action!
Laws are being broken. People in Arizona are being killed and threatened.
Arizona takes action, and what does Obama do? Does he send troops in to wipe
out the gangs? No, he's going to sue Arizona! What's wrong
SURRENDER TO MEXICO:
What ever happened to 'American' soil?
*
EVEN AS THE MEX DRUG CARTELS POUR OVER OUR BORDERS, OBAMA
HAS TAKEN HUNDREDS MORE GUARD OFF SINCE SEPT 2009! AND THE OBAMA DECLARES
“BORDER SECURITY” IS THE HALLMARK OF HIS PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP!
IN 2012, OBAMA STATIONED 2,500
TROOPS IN AUSTRALIA… YES, AUSTRALIA EVEN HAS HE PROMISES ILLEGALS OPEN BORDERS
WITH NARCOMEX!
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol
Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400
agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to
discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America
is headed.
*
ACCORDING TO SENATOR LAMAR SMITH OF TEXAS, WHEN CHALLENGING
SO- CALLED “HOMELAND SECURITY = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIPS” LA RAZA JANET
NAPOLITANO, AS TO WHY OUR BORDERS ARE WIDE OPEN TO NARCOMEX, OBAMA HAS CUT
ENFORCEMENT BY MORE THAN 60% IN ALL AREAS.
Obama soft
on illegals enforcement
Arrests of
illegal immigrant workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama,
according to figures released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative
arrests, indictments and convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all
fell by more than 50 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
The figures
show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from
going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of
Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled
the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House
Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be
cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans
otherwise would hold.
*
THE
OBAMA LEGACY OF DUPLICITY, CORRUPTION, BANKSTER CRIMES, OPEN BORDERS AND
ENDLESS HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
WHILE
BARACK OBAMA GIVES HIMSELF A B+ (HIS BANKSTERS GAVE HIM THE GRADE) JUDICIAL
WATCH’S GRADE IS A BIT MORE REALISTIC:
JUDICIAL WATCH.org
With trillion dollar bailouts, government-run healthcare,
banks and car companies, ACORN corruption, attacks on conservative media, illegal alien amnesty, unprecedented
and dangerous new rights for terrorists, perks for campaign donors—this is the
Obama legacy—and we haven't even gotten
through the first year of his presidency!
*
latimes.com
What Arizonas immigration law really
says
It's not about racial profiling;
it's about upholding the law.
Dan
Stein
April
30, 2010
"As
we exercise the right to advocate our views, and as we animate our supporters,
we must all assume responsibility for our words and actions before they enter a
vast echo chamber and reach those both serious and delirious, connected and
unhinged."
Those words were written by former President Clinton in a New York Times op-ed
marking the 15th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing.
While Clinton's finger-wagging was directed at critics of the Obama administration, his caution against overblown rhetoric might also be heeded by the vast echo chamber bent on whipping up hysteria in response to a recently passed Arizona law designed to effectively address illegal immigration.
Arizonans have endured decades of federal neglect of immigration enforcement. Half of illegal border crossings now occur in Arizona, and our study found that state taxpayers spend more than $2 billion a year on education and healthcare for illegal immigrants and their children. The porous border is virtually a welcome mat for criminal organizations that run drugs and other contraband through the state. Kidnappings in Phoenix are at an all-time high, and the killing last month of rancher Robert Krentz -- police suspect by an illegal immigrant -- is only the latest graphic example of the impact that rampant illegal immigration has on ordinary Arizonans.
Faced with an ongoing crisis and little help from Washington, Arizona has been forced to respond to protect its residents and its financial resources. This month, the legislature passed and Gov. Jan Brewer signed SB 1070. Among other things, this law requires all law enforcement officers in Arizona to act on reasonable suspicion that an individual is in the country illegally.
The reaction from advocates for illegal immigrants to SB 1070 -- which, according to opinion polls, is supported by some 70% of Arizonans -- can only be described as incendiary and irresponsible, not to mention patently inaccurate. Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahony invoked images of Nazi Germany and Soviet totalitarianism. Reform Immigration for America, an umbrella coalition of pro-amnesty groups, warned ominously that "it's racial profiling, and it encapsulates the hatred we are fighting." ACORN's Bertha Lewis declared, "If this bill passes, Arizona is declaring itself an apartheid state."
SB 1070 is not a mandate for Arizona police to seek out illegal immigrants. It conforms fully with the Constitution's 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure. Under the law, Arizona police are prohibited from racially profiling or stopping anybody merely because of appearance or ethnicity. They may inquire about immigration status only if there is justification for the stop under the Constitution -- such as investigating a possible crime -- and there is reasonable suspicion that the individual is in the U.S. illegally.
And what is reasonable suspicion? Reasonable suspicion might include the lack of any sort of valid U.S. identification documents that police officers routinely request from anyone who is lawfully stopped. The law expressly states that race, color or ethnicity does not constitute reasonable suspicion of illegal presence in the U.S. In reality, SB 1070 does nothing more than require police in Arizona to protect the citizenry and uphold responsibilities abrogated by the federal government.
A ruling by the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals this year provides firm legal footing for Arizona's law. In Estrada vs. Rhode Island, the court affirmed that the failure of an alien to possess alien registration documents represents probable cause for state or local police to arrest the person for a federal misdemeanor committed in the officer's presence, or detain that person until the individual's status can be verified.
Predictably, those who have consistently opposed all efforts to enforce U.S. immigration laws are resorting to a campaign of lies and distortions to fight implementation of the law.
SB 1070, plain and simple, will allow police to identify and detain people because of the laws they violate, not because they happen to meet a particular racial or ethnic profile. What it demands is that state law enforcement officers no longer turn a blind eye in situations in which they reasonably suspect that an individual they have encountered is violating U.S. immigration laws.
Dan Stein is president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
While Clinton's finger-wagging was directed at critics of the Obama administration, his caution against overblown rhetoric might also be heeded by the vast echo chamber bent on whipping up hysteria in response to a recently passed Arizona law designed to effectively address illegal immigration.
Arizonans have endured decades of federal neglect of immigration enforcement. Half of illegal border crossings now occur in Arizona, and our study found that state taxpayers spend more than $2 billion a year on education and healthcare for illegal immigrants and their children. The porous border is virtually a welcome mat for criminal organizations that run drugs and other contraband through the state. Kidnappings in Phoenix are at an all-time high, and the killing last month of rancher Robert Krentz -- police suspect by an illegal immigrant -- is only the latest graphic example of the impact that rampant illegal immigration has on ordinary Arizonans.
Faced with an ongoing crisis and little help from Washington, Arizona has been forced to respond to protect its residents and its financial resources. This month, the legislature passed and Gov. Jan Brewer signed SB 1070. Among other things, this law requires all law enforcement officers in Arizona to act on reasonable suspicion that an individual is in the country illegally.
The reaction from advocates for illegal immigrants to SB 1070 -- which, according to opinion polls, is supported by some 70% of Arizonans -- can only be described as incendiary and irresponsible, not to mention patently inaccurate. Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahony invoked images of Nazi Germany and Soviet totalitarianism. Reform Immigration for America, an umbrella coalition of pro-amnesty groups, warned ominously that "it's racial profiling, and it encapsulates the hatred we are fighting." ACORN's Bertha Lewis declared, "If this bill passes, Arizona is declaring itself an apartheid state."
SB 1070 is not a mandate for Arizona police to seek out illegal immigrants. It conforms fully with the Constitution's 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure. Under the law, Arizona police are prohibited from racially profiling or stopping anybody merely because of appearance or ethnicity. They may inquire about immigration status only if there is justification for the stop under the Constitution -- such as investigating a possible crime -- and there is reasonable suspicion that the individual is in the U.S. illegally.
And what is reasonable suspicion? Reasonable suspicion might include the lack of any sort of valid U.S. identification documents that police officers routinely request from anyone who is lawfully stopped. The law expressly states that race, color or ethnicity does not constitute reasonable suspicion of illegal presence in the U.S. In reality, SB 1070 does nothing more than require police in Arizona to protect the citizenry and uphold responsibilities abrogated by the federal government.
A ruling by the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals this year provides firm legal footing for Arizona's law. In Estrada vs. Rhode Island, the court affirmed that the failure of an alien to possess alien registration documents represents probable cause for state or local police to arrest the person for a federal misdemeanor committed in the officer's presence, or detain that person until the individual's status can be verified.
Predictably, those who have consistently opposed all efforts to enforce U.S. immigration laws are resorting to a campaign of lies and distortions to fight implementation of the law.
SB 1070, plain and simple, will allow police to identify and detain people because of the laws they violate, not because they happen to meet a particular racial or ethnic profile. What it demands is that state law enforcement officers no longer turn a blind eye in situations in which they reasonably suspect that an individual they have encountered is violating U.S. immigration laws.
Dan Stein is president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
*
THE SCARY REALITY OF THE MEXICAN
FASCIST PARTY AT WORK!
Arizona Leads the Way Against
Illegal Immigration
Jacob Laksin is
managing editor of Frontpage Magazine. He is co-author, with David Horowitz, of
One-Party Classroom: How Radical Professors at America's Top Colleges
Indoctrinate Students and Undermine Our Democracy. His work has appeared in
the Wall Street Journal, the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Weekly Standard, City
Journal, Policy Review, as well as other publications. Email him at
jlaksin@gmail.com.
If
you’ve been following the news from Arizona in recent days, you’ve probably
heard that the state’s Republican governor, Jan Brewer, has just signed into
law a “racist” bill that will punish Hispanics, stamp out civil rights, create
a police state – and trample on the Constitution for good measure. You also may
have heard that the Arizona law will “undermine basic notions of fairness,” at
least according to President Obama, who has called the law “misguided” and
ordered the Justice Department to find some way to challenge its standing.
Apocalyptic
rhetoric notwithstanding, the Arizona law is not at all controversial in
substance. All it does is deputize state police to determine whether people are
in the country legally and to question them if there is reasonable suspicion
that they’re not. Of course, that function should properly be handled by the
federal government. But because the government has made so little effort to
enforce immigration laws, border states that bear the brunt of illegal
immigration – an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants call Arizona home – have
been forced to take action on their own terms.
The concept behind the
immigration law is straightforward: If you enforce laws against illegal
immigration, you will have less of it. That was also the idea behind Arizona’s Legal Arizona Workers Act, which
required the state’s employers to verify the immigration status of new hires
using the federal government’s E-Verify program. Businesses eager to avoid the
burdens of verification and pro-illegal immigration groups also opposed that
measure, filing suit to prevent its passage, but emerging evidence seems to
suggest that it had the desired effect: Since being implemented in January
2008, the LAWA has resulted in a substantial decrease of illegal
immigration.
The
new law seeks to continue that progress. It does so mostly by making state crimes what are already
federal crimes.
For instance, the Arizona law makes it a crime to be in the country illegally –
in other words, it enforces the national law. The Arizona law also requires
police to question people about their immigration status if they have
reasonable cause to suspect that they’re illegal immigrants. To prevent abuse
or racial discrimination, the law also includes provisions banning racial
profiling, and the measure itself has nothing to do with race or ethnicity, as
the bill’s foes claim. Still, given that the majority of the state’s illegal
immigrants are from neighboring Mexico, it is inevitable that the majority of
those targeted by the law will be Hispanic. That says more about the
demographics of illegal immigration than the allegedly discriminatory agenda of
Arizona authorities.
Concerns
about the abuse of civil liberties are similarly overblown. The Arizona law
will require anyone arrested for a crime to have their immigration status
established before their release. In theory, this should already be the law of
the land; but so-called “sanctuary city” laws enacted by cities and
municipalities across the country have prevented police from enforcing
immigration laws. Such laws certainly benefit felons who escape deportation.
How they profit the country at large is less apparent. The Arizona law also
requires residents to carry ID or immigration registration documents at all
times. That too is reasonable. A valid ID is already required to qualify for
government and public assistance programs available to citizens and requiring
one form of valid ID – whether a drivers license a government-issue ID — hardly
marks the onset of Nazi Germany. Indeed, no less than President Obama has
previously expressed support for a national ID card.
While
some have criticized Arizona for taking the initiative against illegal
immigration, it’s hard to find fault with the state’s sense of urgency. Last
month’s murder of Arizona cattle rancher Rob Krentz was just example of the
crime problem that unchecked illegal immigration has helped create and the
problems its poses for American justice. Although Kentz was known for providing
illegals with food and water, police found tracks at the murder scene leading
to the Mexican border. They made no arrests in the case. In that climate of
lawlessness, the state cannot be blamed for passing a law that may help offer a
solution. Moreover, with the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats
threatening to take up immigration reform – that is, amnesty for the 11-million
plus illegal immigrants in this country unmatched by serious enforcement
measures going forward – states like Arizona are left with a choice of doing
something to combat the problem or leaving it to the federal government to make
it worse.
LA RAZA, “THE RACE” – THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of AMERICA AT
WORK:
If there is an ugly side
revealed by the Arizona law, it is in the extremism of pro-illegal immigration
groups. On Monday, opponents of the Arizona law used refried beans to smear
swastikas on the Arizona state Capitol. Another champion of illegal
immigration, Mexican President Felipe Calderon, made the not-so-veiled threat
that Mexican trade and political relations with Arizona would suffer if it
cracked down on illegals.
WE
ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE AND PRISON SYSTEM! SAVE NARCOMEX MILLIONS!
Defying
these opponents and braving slander in much of the press coverage, Arizona has
taken the lead in enforcing the country’s immigration laws and protecting the
rights and interests of its citizens. For the Left, the new law makes Arizona a
model of an “American-style
police state.”
For those serious about border security and law enforcement, it makes
*
So, we have
Mexican gangs virtually controlling parts of the United States and making
threats against American law enforcement officials, but does it stop there? Of
course not. Mexico is
also SUING Arizona over its new
illegal immigration law.
Our country is
being occupied!!!! That sentence alone should be a ringing call for action!
Laws are being broken. People in Arizona are being killed and threatened.
Arizona takes action, and what does Obama do? Does he send troops in to wipe
out the gangs? No, he's going to sue Arizona! What's wrong
SURRENDER TO MEXICO:
What ever happened to 'American' soil?
I might be a little slow here, but isn't America a sovereign
nation? Doesn't it have borders and land and citizens? Didn't Americans fight
battles and wars and negotiate land deals to establish this country and set up
a federal government to protect the sovereign nation? Ok, I'm just asking,
because now we have Mexican drug gangs camped out on American soil, and Barack
Obama is doing nothing about it! Isn't protecting the country THE fundamental
function of the president and those in Washington?
Before we get into some details, check out this headline from FoxNews.com: Mexican Gangs
Maintain Permanent Lookout Bases in Hills of Arizona. Did you read it? Ok...
rest five seconds and read it again. This is completely insane!
Mexican
drug cartels have set up shop on American soil, maintaining lookout bases in
strategic locations in the hills of southern Arizona from which their scouts
can monitor every move made by law enforcement officials, federal agents tell
Fox News.
The scouts are supplied by drivers who bring them food, water, batteries for radios -- all the items they need to stay in the wilderness for a long time.
"To say that this area is out of control is an understatement," said an agent who patrols the area and asked not to be named. "We (federal border agents), as well as the Pima County Sheriff Office and the Bureau of Land Management, can attest to that."
The scouts are supplied by drivers who bring them food, water, batteries for radios -- all the items they need to stay in the wilderness for a long time.
"To say that this area is out of control is an understatement," said an agent who patrols the area and asked not to be named. "We (federal border agents), as well as the Pima County Sheriff Office and the Bureau of Land Management, can attest to that."
Not only are the drug and illegal alien traffickers setting up
bases on American soil, they are also issuing threats. As Joshua
Rhett Miller reports, "Police officers in a small Arizona border city are on
heightened alert following a tip that a Mexican drug cartel will put them in
its crosshairs if they conduct off-duty busts."
The
threat stems from a marijuana seizure made this month by two off-duty police
officers riding on horseback in an unincorporated area east of Nogales, a city
of roughly 20,000, Police Chief Jeffrey Kirkham told FoxNews.com.
"The word was that these particular officers would be targeted if they were ever in that area again and were not on duty and intercepted any drug trafficking," Kirkham said. "It said they should look the other way."
"The word was that these particular officers would be targeted if they were ever in that area again and were not on duty and intercepted any drug trafficking," Kirkham said. "It said they should look the other way."
So, we have
Mexican gangs virtually controlling parts of the United States and making
threats against American law enforcement officials, but does it stop there? Of
course not. Mexico is
also SUING Arizona over its new
illegal immigration law.
Mexico
on Tuesday asked a federal court in Arizona to declare the state's new
immigration law unconstitutional, arguing that the country's own interests and
its citizens' rights are at stake.
Lawyers for Mexico on Tuesday submitted a legal brief in support of one of five lawsuits challenging the law. The law will take effect July 29 unless implementation is blocked by a court.
Lawyers for Mexico on Tuesday submitted a legal brief in support of one of five lawsuits challenging the law. The law will take effect July 29 unless implementation is blocked by a court.
Arizona's new law known as SB-1070 "requires police
investigating another incident or crime to ask people about their immigration
status if there's a "reasonable suspicion" they're in the country
illegally. It also makes being in Arizona illegally a misdemeanor, and it prohibits
seeking day-labor work along the state's streets." This law, as many of
you know, is basically a restatement of federal law... a federal law that the
federal government does not enforce. In addition, this law is much more lax
than Mexican immigration law. However, that point seems to be missed in
Mexico's lawsuit.
And the list grows... Mexican gangs controlling parts of the U.S.
and making threats against American cops. In addition, Mexico is suing Arizona
to make sure that the illegal alien "business" keeps right on
flowing. Does it stop there? Unfortunately, yes, because there is NO action
being taken by Obama and his team!
Just watch any interview with a Democrat "strategist"
regarding what's going on in Arizona, and they will pull out their "comprehensive
immigration reform" talking points. Just like Obama is doing with the Gulf
oil spill, they are taking a situation that needs immediate action and turning
it into a call for some left-wing legislation. Our country is being occupied!!!! That sentence alone should be a
ringing call for action! Laws are being broken. People in Arizona are being
killed and threatened. Arizona takes action, and what does Obama do? Does he
send troops in to wipe out the gangs? No, he's going to sue Arizona!
What's wrong
Read more: http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/2010/06/what-ever-happened-to-american-soil.php#ixzz0s4r1zoLa
*
Immigration
advocacy groups to challenge Arizona law
By
Jonathan J. Cooper and Paul Davenport
Sunday, April 25, 2010; A08
Sunday, April 25, 2010; A08
PHOENIX
-- Arizona's governor is vowing that the state's tough new law targeting
illegal immigration
will be implemented with no tolerance for racial profiling, but at least two
advocacy groups are preparing legal challenges and Mexico is warning that the
law could affect cross-border relations.
Gov. Jan Brewer (R) on Friday signed into
law a bill that supporters said would take handcuffs off police in dealing with
illegal immigration in Arizona, the nation's busiest gateway for human and drug
smuggling from Mexico and home to an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants.
The
law requires police to question people about their immigration status --
including asking for identification -- if they suspect that someone is in the
country illegally. It has sparked fears among legal immigrants and U.S.
citizens that they will be hassled by police because they look Hispanic.
The
Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund said it plans to challenge
the law, which it said "launches Arizona into a spiral of pervasive fear,
community distrust, increased crime and costly litigation, with nationwide
repercussions."
CATHOLIC
AND MEXICAN CHURCHES WERE TOLD BY LA RAZA “THE RACE” NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
2010 CENSUS TO KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FROM KNOW THAT THAT OUR GOVERNMENT’S
PROPAGANDA THAT THERE WERE ONLY 12 MILLION ILLEGALS IS JUST THAT! LA RAZA
FASCIST PROPAGANDA! MOST SOURCES PUT THE NUMBER AT 38 MILLION AND BREEDING LIKE
BUNNIES!
William
Sanchez, president of the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian
Leaders Legal Defense Fund, said his group is preparing a federal lawsuit
against Arizona to stop the law from being applied. The group represents 30,000
evangelical churches nationwide, including 300 Latino pastors in Arizona.
THERE
ARE CALCULATED TO BE 38 MILLION OF THESE “SHOCKED” MEXICAN FLAG WAVERS IN THIS
COUNTRY AND IN OUR JOBS!
"Millions
of Latinos around the country are shocked," Sanchez said.
Current
law in Arizona and most other states does not require police to inquire about
immigration status, and many police departments prohibit officers from asking
out of fear of losing immigrants' cooperation in other investigations.
Brewer
ordered the state's law enforcement licensing agency to develop a training
course on how to implement the law without violating civil rights. "We
must enforce the law evenly, and without regard to skin color, accent or social
status," she said. "We must prove the alarmists and the cynics
wrong."
The
measure will take effect in July or August, depending on when the legislative
session
ends.
Immigrants
unable to provide documentation of legal presence could be arrested, jailed for
as long as six months and fined $2,500. Legal immigrants will be required to
carry paperwork proving their status.
The
law also allows suits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of
immigration laws and toughens restrictions on hiring illegal immigrants and
knowingly transporting them.
"It's
going to change our lives," said Emilio Almodovar, a 13-year-old U.S.
citizen from Phoenix. "We can't walk to school anymore. We can't be in the
streets anymore without the [police] thinking we're illegal immigrants."
MEXICO
WARNS!!!! FUCK MEXICO! THEY ARE A SHAMELESS DUMPSTER OF A COUNTRY RUN BY DRUG
DEALERS!
ISN’T
IT TIME TO FLIP OFF MEXICO THAT HAS SENT MILLION OF PREGNANT WOMEN OVER OUR
BORDERS TO GET ON GRINGO WELFARE FOR 18 YEARS?!?!
Mexico
warned that the law could affect cross-border relations, with Foreign Secretary
Patricia Espinosa saying her country would have to "consider whether the
cooperation agreements that have been developed with Arizona are viable and
useful." Francisco Loureiro, an immigration activist who runs a shelter in
Nogales, Mexico, called the measure "racist" and said it would lead
to additional police abuses.
HOW
DO THE ONE MILLION MEX GANGS TREAT THEIR VICTIMS? THERE ARE 500 – 1000 MEX GANG
RELATED MURDERS IN LOS ANGELES ALONE! 95% OF ALL ARRESTS FOR MURDER ARE
MEXICANS! THESE COST NEARLY MILLION EACH JUST TO PROSECUTE. ON LOS ANGELES TOP
200 WANTED CRIMINALS, 176 ARE MEXICANS! ON A.G. TOP 10 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN
CA, ALL ARE MEXICANS.
WHY
NOT LET MEXICO PAY FOR THE COST OF THEIR OWN PRISON SYSTEM?
"Police
in Arizona already treat migrants worse than animals," he said.
"There is already a hunt for migrants, and now it will be open season
under the cover of a law." Loureiro said about 250 deported immigrants
have been arriving nightly at his shelter and that most say they were detained
by police.
After
signing the legislation, Brewer said critics were "overreacting" and
vowed not to tolerate racial profiling.
"We
in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," she
said. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a
dangerous and unacceptable situation."
--
Associated Press
*
DOES ANYONE DOUBT THAT IN MEX OCCUPIED GANG AND WELFARE
CAPITAL OF LA RAZA LAND, LOS ANGELES THAT ILLEGALS TAKE PRIORITY? THEY DO IN
JOBS! 47% OF THOSE WITH A JOB ARE FREAKING ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL
SECURITY NUMBERS!
Gregory Kane: Do Latinos take priority
over whites in Arizona?
America's open-borders crowd didn't just play the race card in the
nation's latest immigration debate. This bunch whipped out an entire deck.
We have none other than the Revvum Al Sharpton himself -- who no
one has described as "Mr. Racial Harmony" -- weighing in with these
gems.
"The Arizona immigration bill is an affront to the civil
rights of all Americans and an attempt to legalize racial profiling."
That one was from the April 25 edition of the Wall Street Journal.
The following one is from Reuters:
"I am calling for the resignation and removal of Sheriff
[Joe] Arpaio. Harassment based on color is nothing short of racial profiling,
which many of us helped to fight to make against the law."
Sharpton was referring to the sheriff of Maricopa County in
Arizona. What's Arpaio's offense, in the good revvum's view? Why, taking our
nation's immigration laws seriously, of course, and rounding up those who
violate them. Here's more of Sharpton continuing his anti-Arpaio rant, taken
from the Reuters story:
"Arpaio needs to be confronted. He needs to be removed. We
also need to suspend the law that he is using. We must stand with our brown
brothers and sisters."
Sharpton lives nowhere near Arizona. If you're wondering where he
found the chutzpah to dredge up with this "we" stuff, you're not
alone.
Sharpton isn't alone either, not when it comes to making spurious,
knee-jerk charges of racism in the wake of Arizona passing a law that allows
cops to question those legally stopped about their immigration status.
It's high time
somebody pointed out the real racists in this controversy. And yes, that would
be many of those making the charges of racism.
Frankly, I suspect much of the reaction comes from those who are
worried about how their lawns are going to be cut if there's a mass deportation
of illegal immigrants. (A word of advice: cut 'em your darned selves.)
Don't non-Hispanic Arizonans get any consideration? (Actually, I
suspect that many of the reported 70 percent of Arizonans who support the law
are Hispanic, which makes the racism of those screaming racism even more
obvious and egregious.) One of those non-Hispanic Arizonans is a woman named
Elisabeth Grey, who posted this comment in reaction to the Wall Street Journal
story:
"I live in a
Tucson neighborhood that is a major drug corridor. In the last four months
there have been over 24 violent home invasions resulting in a number of deaths.
It's harvest time now for marijuana in Mexico and Central America. We expect
the number of deaths to increase.
"One of the
other tragedies is human trafficking. 'Coyotes' bring vans overfilled with
illegal immigrants across the border, and because the load is more than the
vehicle is designed for, the vehicle will often roll, or go off the road,
killing the innocent people on board."
What Grey is telling us is that, in Arizona, the illegal immigrant
problem is now also a public safety problem. And police are allowed to make
stops -- of people on the street and in vehicles -- when crime reaches an
outrageous level. If those stopped in vehicles don't have proper
identification, then any competent police officer will ask those people a
string of questions to determine who they are.
Here's what the opponents of Arizona's new law are saying, and
it's the most outrageously racist thing of all: Police should be allowed to ask
anyone legally stopped about their identities except Hispanics.
Examiner Columnist Gregory Kane is a Pulitzer-nominated news and
opinion journalist who has covered people and politics from Baltimore to the
Sudan.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Do-Latinos-take-priority-over-whites-in-Arizona-92865714.html#ixzz0nm76p5ea
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
From the above blog,
email articles to those concerned about Obama’s endless push for amnesty.
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIAL WATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
*
WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE and PRISON SYSTEMS!
“Mexico’s government has provided
its nationals with valuable tools to help them cross the border safely but
Dominguez is the first American resident, with a salary provided by U.S.
taxpayers, to openly promote such a gadget. A few years ago Mexican officials
published a 32-page booklet (Guia Del Migrante Mexicano) with safety
tips for border crossers and distributed hand-held satellite devices to ensure
the violators complete their journey safely.”
*
KEEP THIS IN MIND AS YOU WITNESS OBAMA AND HIS LA RAZA
HISPANDERING ADMINISTRATION’S ENDLESS ASSAULT ON THE PEOPLE OF ARIZONA FOR MORE
“CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS, KNOWN TO HIM AS “UNREGISTERED VOTERS”.
Gov. Brewer: Most border-crossers are drug
'mules' for Mexican cartels
Expanding on comments made at a candidates' debate, Arizona Gov.
Jan Brewer said today she believes that most illegal immigrants crossing the
border are "mules" carrying drugs for Mexican cartels.
"I believe today, under the circumstances that we're facing,
that the majority of the illegal trespassers that are coming into the state of
Arizona are under the direction and control of organized drug cartels and they
are bringing drugs in," Brewer told the
Associated Press.
"There's strong information to us that they come as illegal
people wanting to come to work. Then they are accosted and they become subjects
of the drug cartel," she said.
During the June 15 Republican debate she said she believed that
most illegal immigrants did not enter the United States for work. She then
associated illegal immigrants with drug smuggling, drop houses, extortion and
other criminal activity, according to AP.
The state law she signed making it a crime to be in Arizona
illegally will take effect next month.
*
AZ Governor: Obama, Calderon Both Want Illegal Immigration to
Continue to Increase Liberal Vote in U.S.
President-elect
Barack Obama meets with Mexico's President Felipe Calderon in Washington. (AP
Photo/Charles Dharapak)
(CNSNews.com) - Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer told CNSNews.com
that she believes neither President Barack Obama of the United States nor
President Felipe Calderon of Mexico wants to secure the U.S.-Mexico border
because they hope illegal aliens will increase liberal voters in the
United States.
“I think it’s
just amazing that the Mexican government, along with President Calderon and the
bordering governors that interact with us, they do not want our borders
secure,” Brewer said in a telephone interview today. “I mean, they have made it
very, very clear.”
When asked why
she believed Calderon does not want the U.S.-Mexico border secured, Brewer
said, “I believe that he believes that he is helping out the federal
administration and they are looking at it in a political mode to bring in newly
registered illegal immigrants to register to vote.”
Brewer,
a Republican, also said Calderon “wants those dollars that they are
raising here in Arizona and in all America being sent back to Mexico to push up
his economy.”
Asked whether she
thinks Calderon wants Mexican citizens to vote in U.S. elections after they
have been given an amnesty and have become citizens of the United States or
while they are still illegal aliens, Brewer said: “Probably both.”
Brewer said she
does not believe President Barack Obama wants to secure the U.S.-Mexico border
and that he wants both an amnesty for illegal aliens and a continuing flow of
illegal aliens across the border because he believes that will increase the
liberal voting bloc in the United States.
“You think
President Obama would like to amnesty the illegal aliens in the United States
today because, for one thing, he believes they would become liberal voters and
support candidates and politicians who would advance his views of what America
should be?” CNSNews.com asked Brewer.
“I do,” she said.
“And you believe
he would like to continue the flow of illegal aliens into the United States,
for among other reasons, to increase the potential voting bloc of people who
would support his agenda?” CNSNews.com asked.
“I do,”said
Brewer.
Here is a partial
transcript of Gov. Jan Brewer’s (R.-Ariz.) conversation with CNSNews.com:
Gov. Jane Brewer: "Every country in the world can secure
their borders. We are the strongest country in the world. And, I mean, if
America can’t secure their borders, who can? And I will note, Terry, that I
think it’s just amazing that the Mexican government, along with President
Calderon and the bordering governors that interact with us, they do not want
our borders secure. I mean, they have made it very, very clear. But they
are building a fence on the southern portion of Mexico to keep the Guatemalans
out."
CNSNews.com
Editor in Chief Terry Jeffrey:
"Why do you believe that President Calderon does not want the U.S. border
secure?"
Brewer: "I believe that he believes that he is
helping out the federal administration and they are looking at it in a
political mode to bring in newly registered illegal immigrants to register to
vote."
Jeffrey: "You think that President Calderon of
Mexico wants to import people to the United States—"
Brewer: "I do."
Jeffrey: "Who will vote in U.S. elections?"
Brewer: "Yes, and he wants those dollars that
they are raising here in Arizona and in all America being sent back to Mexico
to push up his economy."
Jeffrey: "Do you think he wants them to vote in
U.S. elections after they have gotten amnesty and become citizens of the United
States or as illegal aliens?"
Brewer: "I didn’t understand your
question."
Jeffrey: "Well, you say that President Calderon
of Mexico would like to import citizens of his country to the United
States—"
Brewer: "Right."
Jeffrey: "So that they can vote in U.S.
elections?"
Brewer: "Right."
Jeffrey: "Do you think he wants them to vote in
U.S. elections after they have been given amnesty and become citizens of the
United States or while they are still illegal aliens?"
Brewer: "Probably both."
Jeffrey: "You were secretary of state in Arizona.
You were responsible for the elections in your state were you not?"
Brewer: "Right. And we cracked down big time. We
clamped down big time. We were fighting an organization called ACORN. We
had complaints filed all the time. And it’s an unfortunate situation that we
had to live with. But finally everybody in America got control of that issue.
But the bottom line is they want people registered. They want to influence the
politics in America. We want our border secured. We’re tired of it. We can’t
sustain it. We can’t sustain it with the dollars for their education. We can’t
sustain it for their dollars for their health care. We can’t sustain it for
their incarceration. And the federal government is not doing their job."
Jeffrey: "Governor Brewer, I recently interviewed
Sheriff Larry Dever of Cochise County, and I asked him what sort of confidence
he had that in the remainder of his term, before his initial term, the term he
has been elected to, expires in 2012, in January 2013, that President Obama
would actually secure the U.S.-Mexico border, and Sheriff Dever said he had no
confidence in that. He did not believe it would happen. Do you "
Brewer: "I am very doubtful of that. It doesn’t
mean we are going to stop."
Jeffrey: "Do you think he wants to do it?"
Brewer: "No."
Jeffrey: "You do not believe he wants to secure
the border?"
Brewer: "No, I do not believe that he does want
to stop it."
Jeffrey: "Why do you think he wants to keep the
border open?"
Brewer: "For all the reasons we just previously
discussed. I mean, it’s a political situation where they want that voting
bloc, certainly, and foremost. And it’s been videotaped in regards to the
unions that they would be able to get these people to become voters. And
certainly out of the 12 million illegals that are here in regards to amnesty
that would really bolster their voting records, their voters."
Jeffrey: "You think President Obama would like to
amnesty the illegal aliens in the United States today because, for one thing,
he believes they would become liberal voters and support candidates and
politicians who would advance his views of what America should be?"
Brewer: "I do."
Jeffrey: "And you believe he would like to
continue the flow of illegal aliens into the United States, for among reasons,
to increase the potential voting bloc of people who would support his
agenda?"
Brewer:
*
JUDICIAL
WATCH
DHS is OBAMA’S PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP, AMERICAN
JOBS, AND WELFARE FOR ANCHOR BABY BREEDING.
OBAMA HAS SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX EVEN
HAS HE HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORS OVER
THERE!
DHS Failure
Delays Border Fence Project OBAMA’S OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS POLICY WRITTEN
BY MEXICO.
Last
Updated: Fri, 10/22/2010 - 11:25am
In
the Department of Homeland Security’s latest failure to protect the nation, a
costly program to place crucial electronic surveillance systems along the
U.S.-Mexico border is years behind schedule and grossly over budget because the
agency hasn’t adequately managed the contractor doing the work.
As a result, hundreds of
millions of taxpayer dollars will be wasted and the porous southern border will
continue to be vulnerable despite the Obama Administration’s assurances that
it’s as secure as it’s ever been. So far the troubled project, known as Secure
Border Initiative Network, has cost the government $672 million although it’s nowhere
near completion, according to a new report issued by the investigative
arm of Congress (Government Accountability Office).
Launched
by Homeland Security in 2005, the initiative aims to enhance border security by
designing technological tools that enable Border Patrol agents to detect and
respond to incursions along unmanned stretches of the 2,000-mile Mexican
border. This includes installing unattended ground sensors, radars and cameras.
The so-called virtual fence was supposed to be completed by 2011, but Homeland
Security officials recently pushed the date up to 2014.
That’s
because the agency has failed to properly oversee the project’s prime contractor,
resulting in costly rework, numerous delays and lots of extra money. In fact
Homeland Security officials stood by as the contractor provided information
that was “replete with unexplained anomalies, thus rendering the data unfit for
effective contractor management and oversight,” congressional investigators
found.
The
initiative to erect barriers—both electronic and physical—along the U.S. Mexico
border has been plagued with a multitude of problems since it was implemented
under the George W. Bush Administration. After funding issues got largely
settled, some border mayors in Texas blocked the feds from conducting fence
work on city property, a large Indian tribe (Tohono O’odham) in Arizona refused
to allow a fence to be erected along a vulnerable stretch of border and the
so-called virtual fence project has been delayed several times.
Last
year a separate GAO report revealed that the physical fence is costing U.S.
taxpayers an average of nearly $4 million
per mile.
The per mile costs vary considerably depending on the type of fencing,
topography, materials, labor costs and the price of land acquisition, but
investigators determined that serious cost overruns have led to the exorbitant average figure.
*
Miguel Perez
– MEMBER of the MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA
Phoenix
Civil Rights Examiner
Miguel
Perez, current president of Chicanos Unidos Arizona and an active member of La Raza, also served as the vice president of the
Latino civil rights organization MECHA in Fullerton California. He is the son
of two Mexican immigrants. Perez plans to become a lawyer in order to protect
the rights of Latinos. You can reach Perez at mperezlaraza1985@gmail.com.
*
YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT UNDER LA RAZA
OCCUPATION, PHOENIX IS THE SECOND LARGEST CENTER FOR MEXICAN KIDNAPPING NEXT TO
MEXICO CITY, AND THE LARGEST CENTER FOR MEXICAN CAR THEFT. THE MEXICAN DRUG
CARTELS CONSIDER PHOENIX THE GATEWAY TO DRUG DISTRIBUTION. ACCORDING TO THE
FBI, MEX DRUG CARTELS NOW OPERATE IN 233 AMERICAN CITIES.
OBAMA HAS GRANTED MEXICAN TRUCK
DRIVERS RIGHTS TO CROSS OUR BORDERS DESPITE THE PROBLEM OF THESE TRUCKS
CONVEYING DRUGS AND ILLEGALS. BUSH REFUSED TO GRANT MEX TRUCK DRIVERS THIS
SPECIAL LA RAZA RIGHT!
*
IT’S NOT HARD FOR ILLEGALS, INCLUDING VIOLENT MEX GANGS, TO
GET JOBS IN MEX-OCCUPIED AMERICAN WHERE IT IS POSTED NATIONWIDE : No Legal Need
Apply!
“He has helped hundreds of former
gang members gain long-term employment.”
PUBLISHED IN THE PHOENIX CIVIL RIGHTS EXAMINER
Pablo Cruz named president of Nuestros Reconquistos
Miguel Perez, Phoenix Civil Rights Examiner
November 25, 2011
Phoenix civil rights activist Pablo Cruz is replacing Manuel
Longoria as the President of Nuestros Reconquistos, one of Arizona's most
prominent civil rights groups. Manuel Longoria has accepted a prominent
position for the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Pablo Cruz is a
former gang member and an undocumented immigrant who has gone on to represent
several other former gang members in trying to make their lives better. He
has helped hundreds of former gang members gain long-term employment. "I
don't care who you are--everybody deserves a second chance," Cruz claims.
As the President of
Nuestros Reconquistos, Pablo Cruz plans to help Latinos claim back the
Southwest as part of the Latino homeland of Aztlán. "The movement to
reclaim land stolen from Mexico is almost complete. Latinos will soon be able
to live, work, and dream in a land where no other race is allowed."
Pablo Cruz will speak to Latino groups tomorrow morning at
the Phoenix Public Library. He is expected to announce plans to help Barack
Obama's re-election campaign.
http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-phoenix/pablo-cruz-named-president-of-nuestros-reconquistos#ixzz1elFqF3LG
*
Judicial Watch Exposes Mexican
Separatist School
Judicial Watch Exposes Mexican Separatist School Is Academia
Semillas del Pueblo Training the Next Generation of Mexican Revolutionaries?
(Washington, DC) -- Judicial Watch, the public
interest group that investigates and prosecutes corruption, today announced the
release of a special report, Academia Semillas del Pueblo (Seeds of the People
Academy): Training the Next Generation of Mexican Revolutionaries with American
Tax Dollars. Judicial Watch’s report includes excerpts of new documents
obtained by Judicial Watch through the California Public Records Act that
highlight the school’s radical agenda. According to the report’s introduction:
“Academia Semillas del Pueblo is not much more than a training ground for the
Mexican reconquista movement, which seeks to conquer the American Southwest –
by force or by ballot box – and return it to Mexico.” Among the highlights of
Judicial Watch’s special report: • Academia is led by Mexican revolutionary
radical Marcos Aguilar, who recently told an interviewer with UCLA’s Teaching
to change L.A.: “We don’t necessarily want to go to White schoolsthe White
way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually
lead to our own destruction.” • Academia offers an 8th grade United States
history and geography class entitled, “A People’s history of Expansion and
Conflict – A thematic survey of American politics, society, culture and
political economy; Emphasis throughout on the nations the U.S. usurped, invaded
and dominated; Connections between historical rise of capitalism and
imperialism with modern political economy and global social relations.” •
Academia is funded by the Mexican reconquista organization “National Council of
La Raza.” Moreover, Aguilar previously served as a leader of M.E.Ch.A., a
radical student-run Chicano organization, while attending UCLA. According to
M.E.Ch.A.’s official statement of principles, “Aztlan (the American southwest)
belongs to indigenous people, who are sovereign and not subject to a foreign
cultureWe are a union of free pueblos forming a bronze Nation.” • According to
Academia’s original charter application, the school targets “communities [that]
are highly self-identified as Latino.” English instruction for Academia’s
students does not begin until the fourth grade. “Marcos Aguilar’s school seems
to be brainwashing school children with Mexican separatist, anti-American,
Marxist propaganda, and getting American taxpayers to pay for it,” said
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “How could the Los Angeles Unified School
District agree to fund this sham of a school with tax dollars?” To read a copy
of Judicial Watch’s new special report, visit www.judicialwatch.org.
*
RABIDLY RACIST MAYOR ANTONIO “TACO RUNT” VILLARAIGOSA IS A
MEMBER OF M.E.Ch.A
Academia is funded by
the Mexican reconquista organization “National Council of La Raza.” Moreover,
Aguilar previously served as a leader of M.E.Ch.A., a radical student-run Chicano
organization, while attending UCLA.
*
“Last May, the state defeated
the Chamber of Commerce's suit against the law in the Supreme Court.”
Arizona shows pitfalls in Romney’s proposed national E-Verify program
Romney greets supporters in Chandler, Ariz. (Gerald
Herbert/AP)
At
Wednesday night's GOP debate, Mitt Romney called Arizona a "model"
for immigration enforcement, singling out the state's 2007 law mandating that
all employers use the national E-Verify database when hiring workers. He promised to institute a national
E-Verify law if elected. "You do that, and just as Arizona is finding
out, you can stop illegal immigration," he said. Last May, the state defeated the Chamber of Commerce's suit against the
law in the Supreme Court.
Kansas
Secretary of State Kris Kobach, Romney's adviser on immigration issues, helped
write Arizona's E-Verify law as well as Arizona's 2010 SB1070 law (Support Our
Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act). At the recent Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington,
Kobach touted what's happened in Arizona as proof that
"self-deportation"—Romney's chosen immigration strategy—is working.
"People started self-deporting by the tens of thousands," after
E-Verify passed, he said, according to the Hill.
Romney
and Kobach are right that, on at least one level, the law has had a significant
impact in Arizona. A study published last
year by the Public Policy Institute of California shows that about 92,000, or
17 percent, of the Hispanic non-citizen population of Arizona left the state in
the year after the state passed E-Verify legislation; most of those who moved
were probably illegal immigrants. (THEY PROBABLY
MOVED TO MEXIFORNIA!) PPI researchers told
Yahoo News that the law—not the recession, or highly-publicized raids targeting
illegal immigrants—was the most likely cause of the exodus.
Yet
while PPI's research helps predict what might happen if an E-Verify system were
implemented nationally, as Romney hopes, it exposes some of the less-desirable
side-effects of the law as well. In
Arizona, the non-citizen Hispanic workers who did stay behind increasingly
shifted into a shadow economy, said Magnus Lofstrom, a co-author of the
study. The self-employment rate among non-citizen Hispanics in Arizona nearly
doubled post-E-Verify, and a higher proportion of people who said they were
self-employed lived in poverty and lacked health insurance.
Lofstrom
told Yahoo News that the informal economy would grow significantly nationwide
if a national E-Verify system were established. While illegal immigrants in Arizona were able to move to other states
to find work, their choices would be significantly limited if E-Verify were
implemented nationally; the only real (and unlikely) option would be to for
undocumented workers to move to another country. In other words, we'd be
much more likely to see an increase in informal employment rather than a
massive movement among illegal immigrants to "self-deport."
(RIDDING OURSELVES OF THE
LA RAZA OCCUPIERS WILL NOT BE EASY. THEY’RE VOTING MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
INTO OFFICE EVERY ELECTION! IT WILL BRING A DECLINE IN THE STAGGERING COST OF
THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE ($600 MILLION PER YEAR IN LA RAZA INFESTED LOS
ANGELES COUNTY ALONE), AND ALSO THE STAGGERING MEXICAN CRIME RATES. ACCORDING
TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN
GANGS! THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR CHARACTERIZES CA AS THE “MEXICAN GANG
CAPITAL of AMERICA”.)
What
would that mean? An increase in informal employment among the nation's
estimated 11 million illegal immigrants would result in lower tax
revenues--since non-self employed illegal immigrants are more likely to have
taxes withheld from their paychecks--higher poverty levels among illegal
immigrants, and a higher potential for employer abuse, said Lofstrom. (Right
now, America has a relatively small
shadow economy
compared to other developed countries, like Italy.)
Another
snag with instituting a national E-Verify program is that the current system
cannot detect identity fraud. A 2009 government-commissioned study found that E-Verify only
flags illegal immigrants half the time, because it can't detect when a worker
is using documents that belong to someone else. (Employers enter in Social
Security or alien registration numbers, birthdates and names of employees into
the database, which figures out whether they match the federal immigration and
Social Security databases.) To combat
this fraud, Romney has said he supports biometric ID cards for immigrants that
would contain a fingerprint or other identifying device that clears them for
work. Romney hasn't explicitly said that every person in America should
have this card--an idea that many
libertarians object to.
But without being adopted universally, undocumented people could still use
false documents. (The Romney team had not responded to requests for comment
from Yahoo News by the time this article was published.) Mandatory national ID
cards have played a starring role in failed bipartisan immigration reform
proposals in Congress over the past few years.
In Arizona, there is no
state-wide system to make sure businesses are using E-Verify. Rather,
individual citizens are asked to expose employers that they suspect of hiring
illegal immigrants to their local district attorneys. Yet district attorneys were
not granted the power to subpoena businesses that are suspected of hiring
illegal immigrants, and some DAs have complained that the law is an unfunded
mandate for their offices, according to Judy Gans, immigration policy director
at Arizona University's Udall Center. Only
three businesses were prosecuted under the law in the first three years after
it passed.
But
business owners still worry that E-Verify's high error rate could leave them
open to prosecution. Republicans in Arizona's state Senate are now moving to
change the law at their request. Republican state senator Jerry Lewis, who
defeated anti-illegal immigration hardliner Russell Pearce last year in a
historic recall election, is co-sponsoring a bill with seven other Republican
senators to provide "safe harbor" to businesses that use E-Verify but
still accidentally hire unauthorized workers.
Lewis,
who is backing Romney, told Yahoo News that he is not a fan of Kobach's draft
immigration laws.
"Does
Kobach's presence in Romney's campaign create a difficulty for him? I believe
it does," Lewis said. "I think people want a real solution and I
don't think the legislation that has been drafted by Kobach is a real
solution." Lewis said the immigration laws "polarize people."
Lewis
added that he thinks Romney will eventually agree with him that making all
illegal immigrants leave the country is not a solution to the country's
immigration problems.
"I
think he'll realize that there is a place for a real solution to the issue, and
it's not just let's get everybody that's undocumented out of the country,"
Lewis said.
ARIZONA, UNDER LA RAZA
OCCUPATION, ENDORSES ROMNEY, WHILE THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS STILL STAND BEHIND
THEIR MAN OBAMA!
OBAMA HAS SUED THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE OF AZ ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS, HAS
SABOTAGED E-VERIFY IN AZ, AND MADE BORDER SECURITY A JOKE!
NEXT TO MEXICO CITY,
PHOENIX IS THE CAPITAL OF MEXICAN KIDNAPPING, HOME INVASION, CAR THEFT, AND
GATEWAY FOR THE SOUTHERN INVASION OF THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS!
*
PAT
BUCHANAN ON OBAMA’S HISPANDERING FOR THE
ILLEGALS’ VOTES:
What
is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal
laws are faithfully executed?
He
is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is
not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country
of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of
Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own
dereliction of duty.
*
TOWNHALL.com
Whose Country Is This?
Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
With the support of 70
percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and police to secure the
border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom now reside there.
Arizona acted because the
U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to protect the states
from invasion and refuses to enforce America's immigration laws.
"We in Arizona have been
more than patient waiting for Washington to act," said Gov. Jan Brewer.
"But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created an unacceptable
situation."
We have a crisis in Arizona
because we have a failed state in Washington.
What
is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws
are faithfully executed?
He
is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is
not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country
of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of
Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own
dereliction of duty.
He has denounced Arizona as
"misguided." He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that
Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's civil rights. But he has
said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the
costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.
How's that for Andrew
Jackson-style leadership?
Obama has done everything but
his duty to enforce the law.
Undeniably, making it a state
as well as a federal crime to be in this country illegally, and requiring
police to check the immigration status of anyone they have a "reasonable
suspicion" is here illegally, is tough and burdensome. But what choice did
Arizona have?
The state has a fiscal crisis
caused in part by the burden of providing schooling and social welfare for
illegals and their families, who consume far more in services than they pay in
taxes and who continue to pour in. Even John McCain is now calling for 3,000
troops on the border.
Police officers and a
prominent rancher have been murdered. There have been kidnappings believed to
be tied to the Mexican drug cartels. There are nightly high-speed chases
through the barrios where innocent people are constantly at risk.
If Arizona does not get
control of the border and stop the invasion, U.S. citizens will stop coming to
Arizona and will begin to depart, as they are already fleeing California.
A
country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country anymore, Ronald
Reagan reminded us.
What we are talking about
here is the Balkanization and breakup of a nation into ethnic enclaves. A country that cannot control its borders
isn't really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.
The tasks that Arizonans are
themselves undertaking are ones that belong by right, the Constitution and
federal law to the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and
Homeland Security.
Arizona has been compelled to
assume the feds' role because the feds won't do their job. And for that
dereliction of duty the buck stops on the desk of the president of the United
States.
Why is Obama paralyzed? Why
does he not enforce the law, even if he dislikes it, by punishing the
businessmen who hire illegals and by sending the 12 million to 20 million
illegals back home? President Eisenhower did it. Why won't he?
*
OBAMA THE HISPANDERING
PRESIDENT SELLING OUT HIS OWN COUNTRY FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
*
Because he is politically
correct. Because he owes a big debt to the Hispanic lobby that helped deliver
two-thirds of that vote in 2008. Though most citizens of Hispanic descent in
Arizona want the border protected and the laws enforced, the Hispanic lobby
demands that the law be changed.
Fair enough. But the nation
rose up as one to reject the "path-to-citizenship" -- i.e., amnesty
-- that the 2007 plan of George W. Bush, McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack
Obama envisioned.
Al Sharpton threatens to go
to Phoenix and march in the streets against the new Arizona law. Let him go.
JOBS? NO LEGAL NEED APPLY
HERE!
Let us see how many
African-Americans, who are today frozen out of the 8 million jobs held by
illegal aliens that might otherwise go to them or their children, will march to
defend an invasion for which they are themselves paying the heaviest price.
Last year, while Americans
were losing a net of 5 million jobs, the U.S. government -- Bush and Obama both
-- issued 1,131,000 green cards to legal immigrants to come and take the jobs
that did open up, a flood of immigrants equaled in only four other years in our
history.
What are we doing to our own
people?
Whose country is this,
anyway?
America today has an
establishment that, because it does not like the immigration laws, countenances
and condones wholesale violation of those laws.
Nevertheless, under those
laws, the U.S. government is obligated to deport illegal aliens and punish
businesses that knowingly hire them.
This is not an option. It is
an obligation.
Can anyone say Barack Obama
is meeting that obligation?
*
FAIRUS.org
The Administration's Phantom
Immigration Enforcement Policy
According to DHS’s own reports, very
little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and
gaining control is not even a goal of the department.
By Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The setting was not quite the
flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner
as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for
American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet
Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the
Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the
millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.
PLEASE EMAIL THIS
BLOG POSTING TO YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS! YOUR STATE IS NEXT TO FALL TO MEXICO!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)